The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete as my searches found nothing else better and the article contains nothing else convincing....Not to mention it's unsourced! Notifying
DGG for his familiar analysis.
SwisterTwistertalk 05:48, 8 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Postpone decision untilit can be looked at by someone familiar with the relevant language and able to look for sources. DGG (
talk ) 04:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:14, 13 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Onel5969TT me 13:23, 16 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete pending evidence of significant coverage from reliable sources. Regards,
Yamaguchi先生 (
talk) 19:34, 16 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails
WP:GNG: insufficient reliable, third-party verifiable sources to indicate notability.
FortunaImperatrix Mundi 12:54, 19 May 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.