- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:39, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
- Majid Khan (politician) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability, and none is presumed from this relatively minor position. DGG ( talk ) 04:07, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:39, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:39, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete I can't find any coverage to give as evidence for notability, let alone substantial national coverage. Ralbegen ( talk) 12:17, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - as far as I can tell his position is serving on the town council of a town of 20,000, with no other claims to notability. Smallbones( smalltalk) 18:13, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Local authority councillors in the UK are not accorded an automatic presumption of notability under WP:NPOL just for existing, but this article neither provides nor reliably sources any strong evidence that he could be considered more notable than the norm. Bearcat ( talk) 23:22, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.