The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Madlib. (non-admin closure) f e minist 13:00, 26 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Madlib Invazion (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per source searches, fails WP:CORPDEPTH. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:18, 19 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:18, 19 October 2017 (UTC) reply

• Redirect to Madlib, perhaps? He's definitely notable even if the label is not (yet). A Train ^talk 10:44, 19 October 2017 (UTC) reply
• Redirect to Madlib, where it is discussed. -- Michig ( talk) 16:44, 19 October 2017 (UTC) reply
• Comment – A redirect is fine by me. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:58, 26 October 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.