The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Keep.
I'm withdrawing this nomination because I was unaware of other sources when I made it as I was searching for the MLW M-640. Oaktree b has clearly demonstrated other sources.
TarnishedPathtalk04:37, 26 November 2023 (UTC)reply
This appears to have been
WP:REFBOMBed to make it appear more notable than it is. The first, second and fourth citations do not refer to the MLW M-640 at all as far as I can tell. They reference the Canadian Pacific 4744 and then only in passing. Not sure about the third citation. If the third citation does go into any any depth, one in depth citation by itself by itself is not enough to establish notability. Given the track record of this IP user I highly doubt the third citation does reference the subject in an depth, if at all. This does not pass
WP:GNG as it has no independent notability outside of the Canadian Railway Museum. Suggest a redirect to
Canadian Railway Museum.
TarnishedPathtalk11:29, 25 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment: Also coverage in the CP Corporate history magazine here
[1] and
[2], some discussion in an electrical engineering journal (paywalled)
[3]. Here's a better link for the museum
[4]. An "under the hood" look at the loco
[5]Oaktree b (
talk)
17:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Anymore sources? Because I have added the current ones you mentioned into the further reading. Only for you to put them into their respective sentences that they are meant for.
118.210.56.198 (
talk)
20:45, 25 November 2023 (UTC)reply
They mention how it was redone using AC propulsion while keeping the original ALCO. "...Development Corporation, Canadian Pacific led the way in 1984, extensively rebuilding Montreal Locomotive Works M640 4744, a conventional D.C. locomotive, into an A.C.-traction testbed. In November 1984, 4744 emerged from CP Rail's Angus Shop, still with its unique 18cylinder, 4000 h.p. Alco 251 engine, but with its electrical and control systems radically altered. Converted from..."
Oaktree b (
talk)
20:36, 25 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.