The result was delete. Sadly - because the article has been rewritten really well - the arguments for deletion, as summarized by Megeboz, are compelling and I must give them determinative weight per WP:DGFA. While the article is now verifiable, the thorough discussion shows that notability (as determined by significant coverage in reliable sources) is lacking. I'll userfy this on request. Sandstein 05:11, 12 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Non notable software with no reliable sources to back any potential claim to notability Theserialcomma ( talk) 02:16, 4 June 2009 (UTC) reply