From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 00:46, 11 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Lyda Krewson (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable St. Louis alderman. Fails to meet WP:POLITICIAN. reddogsix ( talk) 04:45, 3 March 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Weak Delete In its current state, I concur that this article doesn't meet WP:POLITICIAN. If an expert on the subject can confirm expansion is not possible, I will strengthen my opinion. Right now, I assume expansion is not possible, but I am not entirely sure. South Nashua ( talk) 14:22, 3 March 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:33, 3 March 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:33, 3 March 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Fails WP:NPOL. The article makes no other claim to notability. AusLondonder ( talk) 16:55, 3 March 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. St. Louis is listed as a gamma-class global city, so she would certainly qualify for a Wikipedia article on "city councillor in a global city" grounds if something more substantive could be written and sourced about her than just "she exists and she's running for mayor" — but this, as written, is not the article that gets her over WP:NPOL #2. No prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can do better than this. Bearcat ( talk) 21:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - doesn't meet WP:POLITICIAN. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:57, 10 March 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.