The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Inadequately sourced
WP:BLP of a person notable primarily as a city councillor, in a city not large enough to confer automatic notability freebies on its city councillors. Of the eight footnotes here, four are
primary sources (i.e. her own "staff" profiles on the websites of the city and organizations she's directly affiliated with) that cannot demonstrate or support notability, and one of the "media" hits comes from the local university's journalism school rather than a real media outlet — while the three that actually represent real
reliable source coverage all just nominally verify her initial election rather than offering any substantive ongoing coverage of anything she did in the role. And the only other potential "notable for other reasons" claims here are not referenced to coverage of her work in those roles, but to background mentions of it in the elected-to-city-council coverage -- which is not how you demonstrate that a city councillor has a valid claim of preexisting notability for other reasons besides being a city councillor either.
Bearcat (
talk)
16:40, 3 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.