- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Louisiana Genealogical and Historical Society
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Louisiana Genealogical and Historical Society ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Local history society that does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGCRIT. The below is a high-level analysis of sources present in the article at time of nom:
Source assessment table:
| ||||
| Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sources 1-4 | 
|
~ Blogs and user sites |  Basic listings
|
✘ No |
| Sources 6-7 |
WP:SELFPUB
|
WP:SELFPUB
|
? | ✘ No |
| American Press article |
|
|
~ Although this is predominantly coverage of the person, and notability is not WP:INHERITED, there is some SIGCOV of the society. | ~ Partial |
| Sources 9-13 | ~ Varies | ~ Varies | Many of these sources do not even mention the article subject; at best they are
WP:PASSING mentions.
|
✘ No |
| This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. | ||||
Other coverage that I have been able to locate essentially falls into one of these same three categories: WP:ROUTINE mentions in genealogical material; WP:PRIMARY sources published by the org themselves - not an indicator of notability; and trivial mentions in sources concentrating on other subjects.
While this appears to be an active organisation, it also appears to be at best a case of WP:LOCALFAME. Triptothecottage ( talk) 04:13, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Louisiana. Triptothecottage ( talk) 04:13, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - Agreed on the above assessment. Not a widely-known or widely-referred-to organization.
- WmLawson ( talk) 13:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.