The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
A political candidate with the coverage expected of this - doesn't meet
WP:NPOL or
WP:GNG. Perhaps
WP:TOOSOON.
Boleyn (
talk) 07:55, 17 December 2017 (UTC)reply
I'm happy with that suggestion. Best wishes,
Boleyn (
talk) 11:24, 17 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep per substantial coverage of his political and business activities.
FloridaArmy (
talk) 17:04, 18 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Winged BladesGodric 09:36, 25 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete or redirect. Being an as yet non-winning candidate in a future election is not a notability claim in and of itself, but nothing here makes a strong enough or sufficiently sourced claim that he has preexisting notability under another inclusion criterion.
Bearcat (
talk) 05:37, 27 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete To begin with, it is some time until the primary election in Florida, we have not even passed the filing deadline to run, so Sola is not for sure even going to be the Republican candidate. Only if he wins in the general election, will he be notable.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 06:24, 27 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep The provided sources are sufficient. @
FloridaArmy Please elaborate the article to pass
WP:BIO.
Genome$100 (
talk) 13:54, 28 December 2017 (UTC)reply
No, the provided sources aren't sufficient — seven of the 11 footnotes are
primary sources that cannot assist notability at all, and he's merely namechecked in, not substantively the subject of, two of the remaining four. That is not what constitutes "sufficient" sourcing to make a person notable enough for an encyclopedia article.
Bearcat (
talk) 03:55, 29 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete - As per John Pack Lambert and Bearcat, fails
WP:GNG.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 12:06, 29 December 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.