From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 18:54, 27 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Louis Byrd (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a person notable primarily as mayor of a city that is not large enough to hand its mayors an automatic inclusion freebie in the absence of much better sourcing than this. There are also WP:PERP overtones here, because this basically elides any substantive content about his mayoralty and instead concentrates entirely on corruption allegations. And of the five footnotes here, one is a primary source table of election results that is not support for notability at all, one is a user-generated discussion forum reposting the primary source text of a court ruling that isn't really about Byrd at all but just mentions his name a single time by way of background context, and two are just glancing namechecks of his existence in newspaper articles about other things -- and the one source here that is actually about Byrd in any non-trivial way is not enough to get him over WP:GNG all by itself as the only substantive source in play. A mayor's article has to be a lot more substantial and a lot better sourced than this to get him over WP:NPOL #2. Bearcat ( talk) 14:56, 20 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat ( talk) 14:56, 20 September 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Bearcat ( talk) 14:56, 20 September 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.