The result was speedy keep under criterion 2d: "nominations that are clearly an attempt to end an editing dispute through deletion, where dispute resolution is a more appropriate course". There is absolutely zero reason to delete this article, and I don't see any justification for WP:TNT here. Without placing blame on any one party, I note that none of the editors involved in the current editing dispute has posted on the article talk page up to this point. Non-admin closure. — KuyaBriBri Talk 17:10, 13 May 2013 (UTC) reply
WP:TNT, better no article than an article that is reverted to nonsense and is in violation of the manual of style for dp's. The Banner talk 14:28, 13 May 2013 (UTC) reply