The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This article does not in any way make clear how the hotel is notable. Improvement tags have been on it for over a year and no action has been taken. I am unable to find any notability elsewhere online and so I do not feel this hotel meets the notability requirements.
Oddbodz - (
Talk) (
Contribs)
16:41, 22 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. It sounds quite notable, having stopped an ancient fire. It is a historic site, a Grade II listed building. Shouldn't there be official documents relating to its listing, available as sources, although likely not online. (And if it were not a historic building, then merging to
List of hotels or a subpage, or to some other suitable target, would be superior to deleting it.) We should look for alternatives to deletion, and not just tear stuff down. --
doncram16:09, 23 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment. More documentation, online and off-line, may be available for this under its alternate and previous names. Try:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.