Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< 15 September 17 September >

Purge server cache

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Santa Clara University#Centers and institutes. Tone 09:23, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Ignatian Center for Jesuit Education

Ignatian Center for Jesuit Education (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, part of the Santa Clara University without enough notability to warrant a separate article. The Banner  talk 09:55, 10 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 11:10, 10 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 11:10, 10 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 11:10, 10 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 11:10, 10 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga ( talk) 23:27, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 09:24, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Horipro

Horipro (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are too weak to show that this company passes WP:NORG. Tagged over a year ago as needing more sources to show it meets notability criteria and none have been added. Fails WP:GNG Dom from Paris ( talk) 22:29, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris ( talk) 22:30, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris ( talk) 22:30, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep No question. Even though there aren't great sources they (and ANN, linked as an ext link, and Japanese Wikipedia's sources) easily show that this company is a major player. I can try and add a few more. — innotata 02:52, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Just going to point to the part at the top of WP:NORG that says "best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply." Applying WP:COMMONSENSE here means thinking that the company that has managed some of the most well-known stars in Japan, and whose name has often been mentioned alongside those stars in their press coverage across several decades, is probably notable enough to have an article in an encyclopedia that readers can consult. The likely conclusion is the same whether or not a Japanese speaker sifts through 18,000+ GNews hits on "ホリプロ". Bakazaka ( talk) 09:51, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nominator withdrawal due to flawed sourcefinding. (non-admin closure) Kirbanzo ( talk) 01:41, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Bonnie Costello

Bonnie Costello (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable historian, fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. Kirbanzo ( talk) 21:52, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga ( talk) 23:23, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga ( talk) 23:23, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Speedy keep. This badly flawed nomination does not seem to have even considered the correct notability criterion, WP:PROF, which Costello clearly and obviously passes by virtue of her named distinguished professorship (already stated in the article at nomination) and again a second time for her election as a Fellow in the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (easy to find through the sources already present in the article at nomination). In addition (although it will take me some time to collate a more complete list of reviews) JSTOR has at least four reviews for Marianne Moore: Imaginary Possessions, six for Elizabeth Bishop: Questions of Mastery, four for Shifting Ground, and two for Planets on Tables, giving a clear case for WP:AUTHOR. — David Eppstein ( talk) 00:42, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • First, sources for said books? Second, if WP:NAUTHOR is going to be met, the books themselves have to be notable. Kirbanzo ( talk) 01:10, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
    • Search for them on JSTOR as I already said. The books are notable by virtue of having many in-depth published independent reviews. As I already said. And you still aren't even addressing WP:PROF. You might try withdrawing this bad nomination instead of, as it appears, doubling down on it even after its problematic nature has already been clearly demonstrated. — David Eppstein ( talk) 01:19, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Xavier Institute for Tribal Education. Tone 09:25, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Xavier School, Gamharia

Xavier School, Gamharia (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fail WP:GNG, promo, part of Xavier Institute for Tribal Education but without sufficient notability to warrant a separate article The Banner  talk 21:42, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:52, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:52, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:52, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:03, 24 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Anastasia Panina

Anastasia Panina (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Russian film and TV actress. No important roles and awards. So fails WP:NACTOR. -- RTY9099 ( talk) 20:37, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:57, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:57, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:57, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:58, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America 1000 11:27, 24 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Hum Chale Aaye

Hum Chale Aaye (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This tele-film does not appear to meet relevant notability guidelines WP:NFILM and lacks non-trivial coverage from independent reliable sources. Saqib ( talk) 16:07, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Redditaddict 6 9 16:14, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Redditaddict 6 9 16:16, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Redditaddict 6 9 16:16, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep this article as it is star studded film and has based on social issue of joint family systems and their problems which is common in Pakistan.Film also had good reception and has million of views on YouTube. Lillyput4455 ( talk) 22:14, 2 September 2018 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Lillyput4455 ( talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. reply
Not a policy based argument to keep the page. -- Saqib ( talk) 17:27, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply
This user is sock of Pakistanpedia ( talk · contribs)
unproven allegation Atlantic306 ( talk) 17:49, 15 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 13:15, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply
I've reviewed all the sources, and see nothing but name checking, which longstanding practice holds cannot be used to support the notability of the subject. In no source presented can I find the subject discussed with the "significant coverage" WP:GNG requires. -- Saqib ( talk) 04:14, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Joe ( talk) 20:43, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

*Keep as film meet wikipedia guidelines for WP:television and has reliable sources from international newspapers like Nation.Com and The News. Lillyput4455 ( talk) 00:59, 18 September 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:06, 24 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Olabisi Johnson

Olabisi Johnson (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. "References" are single line entries, facebook supported blogs, or fail to mention the article subject. "References" fail to meet the standards in WP:RS and fail to provide significant coverage. reddogsix ( talk) 06:48, 26 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:01, 26 August 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:01, 26 August 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep I strongly object to the deletion of this page. The politician is a notable one. A simple google search will tell you this. The references provided are mostly from the most popular Nigerian newspapers and from the Nigerian law report confirming most of what was reported. Emmantox ( talk) 15:56, 26 August 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - @Lyteon01 - As a start, show me one that is more than a brief mention of the subject and in-depth about the subject - the Wikipedia article is supported by very brief mentions about the article subject. The subject's name in a list of people such as "...while members included Chief Olabisi Johnson," is not in-depth, non-trivial support. reddogsix ( talk) 12:37, 27 August 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - @reddogsix - You have now moved from the issue of notability and significant coverage to Conflict of Interest. Have you considered the possibility that I am just doing a lot of research on the subject and updating the article as the info becomes available? Have you considered the possibility that the subject is notable enough for all this info to be public knowledge within the subject's community and readily available without the editors having any close association with the subject? You proposed that the article should be improved upon yet you continue to pick new issues with each new improvement. Is this also "Wikipedia's standards"? Lyteon01 ( talk) 12:59, 27 August 2018 (UTC)— Lyteon01 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
  • @Lyteon01- No one has changed the focus of ther AfD except you. Lyteon01 created the coi by indicating the staged photo was Lyteon01's own work - this indicates a high probability of coi. I also note you did not deny the coi.
Instead of ignoring the real issue, as I indicated above, point out one reference more than a brief mention of the subject and in-depth about the subject - the Wikipedia article is supported by very brief mentions about the article subject. The subject's name in a list of people such as "...while members included Chief Olabisi Johnson," is not in-depth, non-trivial support. Ignoring the issue of notability will not make it go away. reddogsix ( talk) 14:15, 27 August 2018 (UTC) reply
  • @reddogsix- Like I earlier pointed out to you, the subject is a public figure in a third world country where internet access is relatively recent and still very limited. Being a public figure, anybody can take a photo of him as I did. This does not in anyway indicate a close connection. Would you have preferred a photo from a source that could generate copyright issues for you to pick on? Demanding the kind of online presence that you term "significant coverage" from persons who have only recently gained exposure to the internet doesn't speak much to fair-play. I believe by coi, you refer to this article being a paid job. It is not; and I expect that by Wikipedia standards, that should be taken without prejudice and in good faith. If all the facts that have been placed before you are not sufficient in your opinion to leave this article be, please feel free to yank it off. Obviously, you have made up your mind and no amount of improvement to the article will satisfy you. Lyteon01 ( talk) 14:52, 27 August 2018 (UTC)— Lyteon01 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
  • @Lyteon01 - The criteria for inclusion into Wikipedia is quite clear and has been pointed out to you numerous times. Please see WP:BIO, WP:POLITICIAN, and WP:GNG. Just being a public figure is not one of the criteria. Unfortunately, there is no provision for newly minted figures to get a pass because their coverage is not adequate to support inclusion into Wikipedia. I agree it may be difficult to provide online support, but there are thousands and thousands of other articles for the region you point out that have the support needed to be included in Wikipedia - they are able to follow the criteria for inclusion of articles. It is not my intent to have the article removed; only to have it meet Wikipedia criteria. You are right about one thing, I have made up my mind; however, not about what you have indicated. The only thing I am sure of is, currently the article fails to meet Wikipedia criteria. You have a chance to rectify that situation by adding the support needed to insure its long-term addition to Wikipedia. Best of luck. reddogsix ( talk) 17:14, 27 August 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 16:32, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 13:14, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - @reddogsix obviously this article was posted on Wikipedia 2 weeks before the news item was published in The Tribune Newspaper. Tribune obviously copied the File:OLABISI JOHNSON.jpg from Wikipedia without requesting permission from the copyright owner: me. Since material published on Wikipedia are not covered by Nigerian copyright laws, by publishing the said picture on Wikipedia, I have since waived the rights to this image. I request the immediate undeletion of the said image on these grounds. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lyteon01 ( talk • contribs) — Lyteon01 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  • Comment - @Lyteon01 - You have not shown you are the owner of the image. The image may have been published elsewhere before you submitted it to commons - before you write me back and say I am accusing you of this, I am only telling you what is the weakness in your argument. There is a very simple way to establish ownership, all you need to do is follow the instructions in WP:DCM. Once you have established yourself as the owner you can either contact an Admin or resubmit the image in commons. My best to you. reddogsix ( talk) 20:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I am reluctant to close this as no consensus, because the nomination makes a reasonable case for deletion, and there has essentially been no informed discussion about it.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Joe ( talk) 20:42, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete The article is hard to follow to get a good sense of the notability claim, especially because our existing material doesn't seem to address the duties of the position of Chairman of the Ondo West Local Government. Based on what my understanding of the subject, it appears that the subject was the chair of a local administrative division of Ondo State (which is distinct from service as the equivalent of mayor of Ondo City) and would not meet WP:NPOL. The subject is currently running for the Nigerian Senate. While a redirect to the appropriate election page or list of party candidates would be in order, there does not appear to be a valid redirect target. If the subject wins his election, the page can be recreated. -- Enos733 ( talk) 04:23, 19 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Geo-politically, there is nothing like Ondo City, Ondo West is a subclass of Ondo State, not Ondo City. Same way, there is nothing like Ibadan, Benin, etc. These major cities have the same traditional ruler, and have had constitutional government in the past but as at today, Nigeria does not practice monarchy and they've been disintegrated, although monarch are still highly respected according to the constitution. But that being said, anything lower than a ruler for a state fails WP:NPOL, so him being the head of the local government doesn't make him notable. In addition to that, most LGA chairmen in Nigeria are usually appointed by the state government, not democratically. I haven't looked at GNG and other claims in the article. My comment is just to address his position as LGA chairman and WP:NPOL. HandsomeBoy ( talk) 17:09, 20 September 2018 (UTC) reply
I am still unclear about how local government functions in Nigeria, but it appears we reach the same conclusion, that the chair of a local administrative division would not meet WP:NPOL. -- Enos733 ( talk) 21:06, 20 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:25, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

St Thomas Regional School

St Thomas Regional School (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an elementary and middle school with an enrolement of 140. I cannot find any reliable external sources providing extensive coverage of the school. Copyright material has been removed from the page but the present content is minimal. The page was created by a single purpose account who reinserted removed copyright material. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 09:57, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:12, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:12, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:13, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Joe ( talk) 20:38, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:07, 24 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Artyom Yuryevich Ivanov

Artyom Yuryevich Ivanov (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:18, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:18, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:18, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Snow. This is not going to go any other way. ( non-admin closure) duffbeerforme ( talk) 12:36, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply

WAGs

WAGs (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article, with its very narrow specialized scope intended to only a particular audience, is less "encyclopedic" and more "lads 'avin' a giggle browsin' a slag mag, innit" fan blog-like, therefore non-notable. Merge with Tabloid journalism. ItsAlwaysLupus ( talk) 19:08, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:03, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:03, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:03, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:03, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:03, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:05, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:05, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:06, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:06, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 08:23, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) gidonb ( talk) 06:27, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Hermine E. Kleinert

Hermine E. Kleinert (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability. Sources include accession records of papers and photographs in various collections. Others are catalogues where pieces have been exhibited. Certainly she appears to have been an artist competent enough to have some paintings exhibited. Beyond that the notability trail goes cold. Fails WP:ARTIST.   Velella   Velella Talk   19:00, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:08, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:09, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:09, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:25, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Canadian College of Dental Health

Canadian College of Dental Health (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references. May not exist. Rathfelder ( talk) 18:36, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

  • Delete According to this 2012 CBC article [2] it closed in 2010 or so ("The Ancaster school absorbed students when the Canadian College of Dental Health in Burlington closed about two years ago."). Otherwise search only finds some local coverage in 2007 [3] and passing mentions in coverage of the affiliated Canadian Therapeutic College. As a for-profit institution it has to meet WP:NCORP for commercial organizations. It didn't, and it doesn't. Bakazaka ( talk) 19:37, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:10, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:10, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:11, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America 1000 11:41, 24 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Johnny Sins

AfDs for this article:
Johnny Sins (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable porn star recreated after AfD deletion. Still fails WP:PORNBIO with only a scene-related award win. Still fails WP:GNG/ WP:BASIC without significant coverage by reliable secondary sources. RS references are about the PornHub publicity stunt he participated in. Other biographical sources are interviews and press releases. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:57, 1 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:59, 1 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:00, 1 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:00, 1 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:32, 1 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:33, 1 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:34, 1 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:03, 8 September 2018 (UTC) reply
After two AfDs, such sources still have not been located... -- K.e.coffman ( talk) 22:57, 15 September 2018 (UTC) reply
K.e.coffman, better to delete the article, all porn articles to delete :D Seriously: instead of still voting for removal - look for sources, correct the article. Subtropical-man ( talk / en-2) 12:41, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde ( talk) 17:41, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:08, 24 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Duke Greenhill

Duke Greenhill (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page was tagged for speedy deletion as spam by Edwardx and I agree with him. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 17:16, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

  • Delete Am not seeing anything in the 32 cited sources or searching online that amounts to WP:SIGCOV. Promotional article, eg "a leader in integrated omnichannel storytelling" and "a widely recognized expert and published thought leader on the subjects of branding, storytelling, film and creativity" and that's just from the lead. Edwardx ( talk) 17:31, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:13, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:13, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:08, 24 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Web Community Resource Networks

Web Community Resource Networks (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No working references or evidence of notability. It may be the same organisation as Web Networks Rathfelder ( talk) 17:03, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:15, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:15, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:16, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:16, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:13, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Richard Holton

Richard Holton (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable as sources can't be found. As is often the case with commercial artists, the page is basically used as an ad for his interior design company. Per our policies on advertising, I think the standard for inclusion here should be quite high. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 16:48, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 16:49, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 16:49, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 16:49, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:10, 24 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Himei Koukotsu

Himei Koukotsu (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references, fails WP:MUSICBIO. Can't find anything on him that he hasn't put out himself. RoseCherry64 ( talk) 15:42, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. RoseCherry64 ( talk) 15:43, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:02, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kpg jhp jm 04:55, 22 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Republican Party of Labour and Justice

Republican Party of Labour and Justice (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

1) the article does not show the significance and importance of the party. 2) the article does not refer to external, authoritative, independent media. 3) the article has an advertising, news, non-analytical, non-detailed character. The article contains original research. The article deceives the reader and misleads the reader. by rules, the article needs to be deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.72.210.210 ( talk) 09:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belarus-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:35, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:35, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to R (programming language), per WP:ATD. Regarding, My encyclopedic purpose is to document the RStudio Addins functionality, please note that what you're describing is WP:HOWTO, which is not an appropriate reason for an encyclopedia article. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:20, 24 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Datasets.load

Datasets.load (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor software product, does not appear to be covered by reliable independent sources and thus fails WP:GNG. — Frayæ ( Talk/ Spjall) 14:58, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:05, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:05, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Hello, I think that this software product can be considered of sufficient notoriety, it has over 2,000 downloads a months, putting it in the 9th percentile of most popular package, and it is also preinstalled by universities in their R environments (I included references for this). I would very much appreciate any suggestions on how to better make my case. -- Aditisrinivasan ( talk) 15:28, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
A good option would be to rewrite R_(programming_language)#Packages as an alternative place to put a more concise summary of the information. — Frayæ ( Talk/ Spjall) 16:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Weak delete This is a massively popular package. It's difficult to do much with R without using it. However, is that encyclopedic? I see little scope for an encyclopedia article here which could be any more than the same user material already available. Certainly the article as it stands makes no attempt to do any such thing. There is a little scope for discussion of the problem of loading wild datasets in general, and how the R world addresses this. Andy Dingley ( talk) 16:13, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
I will add a discussion on the problem of loading wild datasets, with a stronger reference to R_(programming_language). My encyclopedic purpose is to document the RStudio Addins functionality (I also edited the RStudio page), because I believe it is important functionality, especially for newer users. -- Aditisrinivasan ( talk) 07:49, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
I added a section R datasets which explains the standard R handling of datasets and positions the package against that. -- Aditisrinivasan ( talk) 10:46, 19 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. No sign of significant coverage in independent reliable sources, only a one-line mention in a single blog. (It simply isn't true that it's difficult to do much with R without it; it wasn't released until December 2016, by which time R was already one of the most popular statistics packages in the world. I can only think Andy Dingley is confusing it with something else..??) Qwfp ( talk) 19:52, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Agreed that R has been used a long time without it, at the same time, the number of R users has grown substantially since 2016, part of that is increased accessibility, perhaps mostly due to RStudio, that was also the impetus for writing this article, I also added a section on RStudio Addins to the main RStudio page. This is the encyplopedic purpose, to document this functionality, which is important to users and especially newer users with less experience with CLI. I agree that perhaps eventually it could be merged, but I would appreciate it if I could grow out the article a bit, and then perhaps eventually merge with others. -- Aditisrinivasan ( talk) 07:49, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:14, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

SMP Negeri 3 Manonjaya

SMP Negeri 3 Manonjaya (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A junior high school which is not notable. — Frayæ ( Talk/ Spjall) 14:54, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:08, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:08, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:08, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The article has been updated. (non-admin closure) Szzuk ( talk) 20:25, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Chronicle (UK TV series)

Chronicle (UK TV series) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In the eight years that the article has been in place, not a single usable source has been found (only IMDB and a dead piracy site, besides primary sources) and notability has not been established, so I’m nominating it on notability grounds. Thank you. — 67.14.236.193 ( talk) 00:40, 14 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Withdrawn by nominator now that all deletion supporters have recanted. Not sure if it would be kosher for me to close it myself. — 67.14.236.193 ( talk) 23:05, 19 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:09, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:09, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • I searched for and found some sources that would be expected for such a series. "Chronicle: A Glimpse of TV Heaven · British Universities Film & Video Council". bufvc.ac.uk. Retrieved 16 September 2018. and Nicholas, Sian; O'Malley, Tom; Williams, Kevin (2013). Reconstructing the Past: History in the Mass Media 1890–2005. Routledge. ISBN  9781317996842.. I vaguely remember watching it once as well. It's the sort of series where you watch it to learn about serious topics and the series itself is not relevant. — Frayæ ( Talk/ Spjall) 15:58, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Somewhat strong delete. I don't see a way we can improve this article. There's no strongly related articles we can merge to, plus, that show died decades ago. It's unlikely someone will ever visit it, so why waste any time improving it with whatever's left of info about it? Techy Halnerd (speak) 16:07, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - this article is a mere two sentences long and does not say very much. Vorbee ( talk) 17:00, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
    it was a much longer article as shown here before it was slashed Atlantic306 ( talk) 17:07, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
    Correction: it was exactly the same size of an article, and a long list of WP:INDISCRIMINATE airdates and titles more suited to a database. If you can add information (not just raw data) about each episode, go for it, but from what I can tell, there is no information about a majority of them. — 67.14.236.193 ( talk) 22:44, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep has reliable sources book sources as shown above and as it was screened on the BBC when there were only 3 tv channels in the UK it is bound to have been reviewed in reliable sources such as The Guardian and The Daily Telegraph, regards Atlantic306 ( talk) 17:07, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep I had another look. " In the 1960s and 1970s, the best known UK programme was the BBC's documentary series Chronicle." and " Chronicle was a successful BBC television series which ran for over 25 years" suggest that it was relevant. I have also found that it was created by Magnus Magnusson, and there are citations for this. WILLIAM TINNING. "Magnus Magnusson has cancer Journalist and author 'in good fettle' but cancels appearances." The Herald. Herald & Times Group. 2006. HighBeam Research. 16 Sep. 2018 < https://www.highbeam.com>. and "Magnus battles cancer." Daily Record (Glasgow, Scotland). MGN Ltd. 2006. HighBeam Research. 16 Sep. 2018 < https://www.highbeam.com>. Overall I think this is a keep. — Frayæ ( Talk/ Spjall) 17:31, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Strong keep Obviously notable series which was a landmark in early Television treatment of archaeology. Is now being expanded with strong WP:RS's. The article was merely neglected. That is no reason for deletion. WP should have an article covering this influential series. Simon Adler ( talk) 17:49, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per WP:NTV Generally, an individual radio or television program is likely to be notable if it airs on a network of radio or television stations (either national or regional in scope), or on a cable television channel with a broad regional or national audience. Chronicle was considered one of the flagship programmes on the BBC and it ran for 25 years - [14] [15] if that isn't notable you can very well delete 90% of all TV show articles on Wikipedia. Hzh ( talk) 17:54, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
    Quite right Hzh. If we start to delete articles on the grounds of 'popularity', and being 'forgotten' we are on a slippery path indeed. I suspect the issue is the age demographic of WP readers, who simply have not heard of the series, being too young. Well let's delete every TV programme article which was made prior to 1980? Its the same logic. Simon Adler ( talk) 18:00, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
    The IP nominator of this deletion also removed a big chunk of content that is valid for television show, it would seem that he or she is unaware of the guidelines for television and deletion criteria. For example the nominator is supposed to check for sources themselves per WP:BEFORE, and the sources in the article do not determine the notability per WP:NEXIST. There is a reason why IP editors cannot nominate article for deletion. Hzh ( talk) 20:48, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
    @ Hzh: Registering an account imparts no magical knowledge or expertise that longtime anon editors lack, but please do a more thorough check of my browser search history. — 67.14.236.193 ( talk) 22:32, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • The following vote to Keep and Improve was posted to the article’s talkpage before this AFD page was created: 67.14.236.193 ( talk) 22:36, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
    Chronicle was a well-respected series and is considered a landmark in TV's first forays into archaeology. I have provided a provisional source from a book published by the Institute of Archaeology, University College, London, which discusses the series in some depth. From a cursory search there are other independent sources discussing the series and it's impact. It would appear to be notable. I do remember watching it as a child. Keep and improve. I would advise against deletion. Irondome ( talk) 01:18, 14 September 2018 (UTC) reply
    I never doubted that it was on the air or that people watched it; I doubted whether anyone wrote about it, given the article’s long history of no reliable sources. If they can be found even with a “cursory search,” I’m at a loss to explain the total lack of editor interest. But thanks! — 67.14.236.193 ( talk) 02:13, 14 September 2018 (UTC) reply
    I think it's just been forgotten which is a shame. WP is a huge virtual warehouse, and it has unvisited, and unloved corners. We could fix the article up so it is fit for purpose. Appreciate the response. Thanks, Irondome ( talk) 02:22, 14 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep It aired on the BBC nationally for 25 years. Ridiculous nom; so it isn't Doctor Who. If it stayed on the air that long, people were interested in watching long enough to keep it on the air that long. We have "26-and-out" literal toy commercials that most kids didn't care about, but they still get an article here because some kid cared about them. Nate • ( chatter) 02:21, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
    @ Mrschimpf: I feel like I keep saying this, but the issue isn’t whether people were interested; it’s whether sources have covered it in-depth. For instance, Bravestarr cites news stories and DVD reviews; it may not be as notable as Doctor Who, and I’ve never even heard of it, but that gets an article here because RSes have written about it specifically. On the other hand, I would say Spiral Zone gets an article here solely because no one’s bothered to delete it yet, assuming the sources it cites are the best we can do. For all I know, everyone on the planet except for me grew up watching Spiral Zone, but if none of them ever produced anything that discusses it in any meaningful capacity, it shouldn’t have more than a mention in the project.
    All of which is to say, please keep arguments focused on coverage of the subject. Longevity and popularity don’t matter without it. — 67.14.236.193 ( talk) 03:25, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
    So will you now withdraw the nomination given the sources found? Hzh ( talk) 08:15, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
    Comment Undoubtedly they did and sources have easily been located, suggesting you didn't perform WP:BEFORE before the nomination. I'm getting tired of AfD's for longtime shows just because 'nobody watched this and sourcing is thin'. By design, educational programming usually isn't going to get as much coverage as primetime entertainment programming. Please consider as such for future noms. Nate • ( chatter) 13:15, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
    It doesn't help that many appear to have the strange idea that if sources can't be easily found online, it doesn't exist. That is particularly problematic for older shows whose coverage may not be archived online. Coupled with an ignorance of the guideline (which clearly stated that such programmes are likely to be notable), and an inability to conduct searches properly, it means that others would have to do the work for them, and spend time discussing things they don't need to. Hzh ( talk) 16:06, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
    @ Hzh: Likely to be notable ≠ actually notable. But yes, I bow to your Google-fu regarding subjects I’m unfamiliar with, and I withdraw my support to delete (I can’t withdraw the nomination because it does have other “delete” votes). Not sure where you get the idea that this volunteer work is compulsory, though, and I would not have been able to get this article into its current state myself anyway. — 67.14.236.193 ( talk) 02:30, 18 September 2018 (UTC) reply
    @ Mrschimpf: Why would educational programming be designed to receive less coverage? Wouldn’t it be the more important programming? — 67.14.236.193 ( talk) 02:30, 18 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - WP:HEY. The article has now been properly sourced and cleaned up. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:29, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Comment Now that the article has been completely rewritten, I take back my original nomination. Techy Halnerd (speak) 06:42, 18 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • I am happy to withdraw my call for a deletion now that the article has been tidied up a great deal. Vorbee ( talk) 07:46, 19 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:14, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Vinay kuyya(channel)

Vinay kuyya(channel) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:WEB. Non-notable YouTube channel, lacks significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. GSS ( talk| c| em) 14:02, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS ( talk| c| em) 14:03, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:11, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

It is having significant coverage about the channel and the sources are from notable news sites like times of india and deccan chronicle. Instead of deleting tag you can add artical improving tag. Iamheentity ( talk) User:GSS

  • Delete - an interesting case, but I'm opting for a delete vote. The channel has accrued coverage in WP:RS, but this coverage (including the Times source, which is filed under a Hyderabad News tab) is strictly regional in regards to Hyderabad. One source (the Deccan Chronicle) is also not independent as it is based around an interview with one of the interviewers. This being said, I think WP:INDISCRIMINATE should be applied here, as the channel only has 87,000 subscribers (TOI source says 63,000) and 20 videos (according to Mirichi9). This is a trivial amount by YouTube standards; as an editor who has created three articles about YouTube channels, the least subscribed to channel I wrote about (that of Jesse Cox (YouTuber)) has 963,000 subscribers, and he is considered a small to medium sized channel when compared to his contemporaries. In short, I feel it is subject that is not notable enough for an encyclopedia despite its reliable-yet-regional coverage.-- SamHolt6 ( talk) 16:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete-We are an encyclopedia.And, per nom. ∯WBG converse 05:49, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. -- Tavix ( talk) 18:58, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Killshot (Eminem song)

Killshot (Eminem song) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONGS and is an example of WP:NOTNEWS. There was even a whole article on Eminem's other feuds in his 20-year career, so while this isn't an article about a feud but a song that's part of one, it shows how routine it is that he does this. Although this song is not on the album, it's clearly related to Kamikaze so any lasting information can be placed there, and if this reaches the level of his Ja-Rule/Benzino feud in 2004 it can be mentioned on the main biography as well. I can assume that the defenders of this article will dump a million links about this song as part of the defence, but that is WP:NOTNEWS, they're all from the same time and saying the same thing Anarcho-authoritarian ( talk) 13:44, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:19, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:19, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:19, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:19, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. I'm not sure why you think this song is a violation of WP:NOTNEWS. There is significant coverage of reliable sources that aren't just press releases and news reports. [16] [17] [18] [19]. It's not clearly related to Kamikaze either because this song and the album have nothing to do with each other since the song is a product of the feuding between Eminem and MGK, which is irrelevant to the album. It is debatable that the feuding might be a publicity stunt to boost sales, hence causing some to think the song is directly connected to the album, but there is no evidence of that. This article is about the song not its surrounding feud and reactions, it is not just news and is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The article does not look like it's written in news style and even so, it can be expanded and improved further rather than deleted. Besides, it's only been two days since the song's release and it has already received sufficient coverage, passing WP:NSONGS - "songs and singles are probably notable if they have been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label" which is just an iteration of WP:GNG. The editor whose username is Z0 15:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:14, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Jahnavi Ellore

Jahnavi Ellore (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR and general notability guideline. GSS ( talk| c| em) 13:35, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS ( talk| c| em) 13:39, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS ( talk| c| em) 13:39, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:23, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:26, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
@ Iamheentity: I have removed those sources you added because they're not reliable. Please see WP:RS to understand what a reliable source is. Thank you. GSS ( talk| c| em) 08:53, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:15, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Alfred Radermacher

Alfred Radermacher (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hans Peter Dengel. Originally User:OberRanks (now banned for fabrication of content and sources) had, in Das Boot and in this article, claimed that a character in that film was based on Alfred Radermacher (as he had claimed other characters were based on actual U-96 crew members). But it was all unsourced and that has now been removed. Now that the article has been stubbed to remove all the unsourced and OR material, what we are left with is the bare fact that Radermacher served on the U-boat that was the inspiration for Das Boot. I don't see that that confers notability, and I see no other notability in this article. The only remaining source (now that the one almost certainly fabricated one has been removed) is just Radermacher's service summary. Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 13:12, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. Part of a walled garden built around the notion that crew members of that particular U-boat are notable for their alleged one-to-one correspondence with characters in the book, which would be fallacious even if such a correspondence existed (it apparently doesn't). Apart from that, the subject clearly fails WP:SOLDIER (didn't even command a boat in battle), and most certainly fails WP:GNG. Note that a bare-bones outline of his career could probably be reliably sourced from books such as Busch & Röll, Der U-Boot-Krieg, but that's just routine catalog listings of all boats and commanders, so per "not indiscriminiate information" those listings alone won't imply notability either. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:58, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 20:52, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 20:52, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 20:52, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 20:52, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Oberleutnant zur See not sufficient for WP:SOLDIER. While being featured / being the inspirations of a movie/book can confer notability (by dint of resulting SIGCOV) - it does not appear to be close to the case here. A redirect to Das Boot is perhaps possible, though that article at the moment doesn't mention this individual and the association of this individual with that film/book is un-sourced at the moment. Icewhiz ( talk) 06:38, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
    I removed the mention of him from Das Boot along with the other crew in these edits, as it was all unsourced and all added by chronic fabricator OberRanks. Although the book and film were inspired by the real life U-96, there appears to be no evidence that the characters were based on the real life crew. My guess is that OberRanks simply assumed that each character was based on the real crew member of the same rank/position. Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 07:15, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
    As long as the connection is un-soruced (or OR) - then certainly a redirect is not in order. OberRanks's OR(?) might have been his own - or based on some (possibly unreliable sources) - in my BEFORE I do see some sources for this - it seems Nordwest-Zeitung (regional newspaper) did run a piece or two tying them together - here and here - and there is this podcast. So it is possible possibly to source this if someone were so inclined (does not seem critical for Das Boot, but possible). Regardless - for the AfD, I don't see how this passes notability regardless (a redirect possibly plausible if this gets reintroduced to Das Boot with good sources (which I'm not sure Nordwest-Zeitung would be)). Icewhiz ( talk) 07:34, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
    Well, that local newspaper article cites Radermacher as a kind of expert witness about what life on the real U-96 was like, but it certainly doesn't contain any literary analysis of the relationship between him, as a person, and his fictional counterpart in the novel or film. The whole piece is just about a comparison between the way events on U-96 were fictionalized in the movie and the way they were presented in some other guy's private diary. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:49, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete doesn't meet WP:SOLDIER on rank, awards or capital ship command grounds, and doesn't appear to have been in command of a U-boat that sank any shipping, which might have helped with notability. Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 10:02, 20 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 09:15, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

2018–19 Mid-American Conference men's basketball season

2018–19 Mid-American Conference men's basketball season (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article should be moved back to draft space. No noticeable modifications were made from original article that was moved to draft space. Fbdave ( talk) 13:07, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost ( talk) 14:23, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:27, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:29, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:13, 24 September 2018 (UTC) reply

The InterProse Corporation

The InterProse Corporation (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:31, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:31, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:31, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:15, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Chaitanya Gavali

Chaitanya Gavali (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable mixed martial artist - does not meet WP:NMMA PRehse ( talk) 12:27, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. PRehse ( talk) 12:28, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:32, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Being a sports personality is not grounds for notability. Please state what notability criteria you believe he meets and show the sources that support your claim. Papaursa ( talk) 15:23, 18 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Papaursa ( talk) 15:23, 18 September 2018 (UTC) Papaursa ( talk) 15:23, 18 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete He definitely doesn't meet WP:NMMA. He also lacks the accomplishments in BJJ to meet WP:MANOTE. I don't believe WP:GNG is currently met since the bulk of the coverage is routine sports reporting or is focused on where he trains. If additional significant independent coverage of him in reliable sources can be shown, I will reconsider my vote. Papaursa ( talk) 15:23, 18 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:13, 24 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Northwave (business security)

Northwave (business security) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find any significant sourcing with independent analysis or depth as per WP:NCORP Galobtter ( pingó mió) 12:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 12:07, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 12:07, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 12:07, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:16, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Metadata (company)

Metadata (company) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are the usual promotional churnalism - no real independant sourcing and significant analysis for WP:NCORP Galobtter ( pingó mió) 11:48, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 11:55, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 11:55, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 11:55, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:13, 24 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Pennina Barnett

Pennina Barnett (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Plenty of mentions and listings as a contributor here and there. Plenty of advertisements for books but nothing that talks about her from reliable and independent sources. Fails WP:AUTHOR.   Velella   Velella Talk   11:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 11:54, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 11:54, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 11:54, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 11:54, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Vexations ( talk) 12:37, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete I cannot find enough in-depth coverage in a search independent of the article. Article had signs of falsified/ puffed up sources and claims. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 14:43, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete founded a new and non-notable or , at least, not-yet-notable journal. My searches found a brief mention in Women's Studies Quarterly that described her as a "textile theorist." Lede calls her a "curator" but doesn't say where. There are many museums of textiles, and major museums have curators of textiles; perhaps she had curated some exhibits, but it's not a claim like "curator of textiles at the V & A" would be. I agree with ThatMontrealIP that this has a PROMO feel; Certainly text has a lot of woefully inadequate citations. And, well, I'm just not finding notability. Feel free ot flag me to revisit is somebody sources it. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 18:54, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • About a hundred library holdings: [20]. GScholar h-index of at least 5: [21]. There do seem to be sources saying she won the ALPSP/Charlesworth Award for Best New Journal in 2005: [22]. Some coverage: [23] James500 ( talk) 04:05, 17 September 2018 (UTC) Academic at Goldsmith's College, University of London: [24] [25]. Curator of the modern part of the "Subversive Stitch" exhibition at the Cornerhouse Gallery, Manchester, 1988 (see Cornerhouse): [26] [27] [28] [29]. James500 ( talk) 04:56, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Library holdings are not an indication of notability. Other sources you insclude in the list above are very, very poor, passing or trivial mentions. For example you cite Maxine Bristow's personal web site as a source, and when I go there it is a personal website with the sentence "Pennina Barnett (Senior Lecturer, Department of Art, Goldsmiths, University of London)". That is not a source. Just because someone prints her name in a sentence, it does not make the source usable for notability. We are not looking for quantity of mentions at all, but rather a minimum quantity of high quality sources. Provide some high-quality sources and your argument to keep would have weight. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 23:34, 22 September 2018 (UTC) reply
I am not arguing to keep. I am merely providing information, mainly because someone said that they wanted to know where she had been a curator. I have no opinion about whether she is notable at this time. Library holdings are an indicator of notability if they are large enough. If there were a thousand holdings, that would be conclusive proof of notability. I express no opinion about a hundred at this time. Likewise, h-indexes are used for WP:PROF. I express no opinion about whether a h-index of 5 is sufficient at this time, I merely observe that she has one. James500 ( talk) 06:51, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Thank you. Unique words such as names of museums and universities sometimes help turn sources up in searches, but in this case I, like you, am finding mentions and work she has done, not notability as we define it on Wikipedia. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 17:57, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Please provide a link to the Wikipedia page that mentions library holdings as contributing to notability. We don't go on invented criteria here. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 15:11, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 09:16, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Capella (notation program)

Capella (notation program) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. The article's references aren't reliable sources, and I haven't found any reliable sources. Declined PROD. wumbolo ^^^ 11:41, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

This is a private and completely wrong opinion by user "wumbolo". Why didn't he improve the article instead of pushing for the destruction of knowledge? -- L.Willms ( talk) 12:16, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 11:45, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 11:45, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 11:45, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Although this one appears borderline notability, enough sources have been identified and it's improved. WP:BLUDGEON is to be aware of on all these AfDs. Widefox; talk 22:57, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
I am aware of bludgeoning, and that's why I never reply the same thing. However, maybe you should be also aware of it. wumbolo ^^^ 08:43, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note that "routine" isn't what you think it is. WP:ROUTINE is only for people and events. You've linked it in another software AfD, so it's clear you incorrectly mean that there and here, which does not apply to any of these software AfDs. See WP:BLUDGEON ..sheer volume of comments, such as contradicting every viewpoint that is different from their own. .. . (See also WP:ANI#User:Wumbolo) Widefox; talk 12:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
And now you reply again. How is that not bludgeoning? WP:ROUTINE is specifically for events (not even people), but it can be applied when the word routine appears in other policies and guidelines (which is at WP:NCORP among others). And I'm aware of the ANI thread, and can refute each one of your aspersions. wumbolo ^^^ 14:29, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Because you don't understand bludgeoning? I'm bludgeoning on my own !vote now? Do you desire to restrict me commenting on my own !vote?! If by your own words it's "specifically for events", why did you link it [33] for a software/product article when it doesn't apply in your own words? Widefox; talk 15:35, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
What?! I said that it can be applied. What can be routine except events? People aren't "routine". And WP:ROUTINE nicely explains what "routine" means. I can cite whatever policy or guideline I can if I can prove that it applies to the subject in question. wumbolo ^^^ 15:42, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
(ec) and yes, the issue is linking to the wrong guideline for the AfD. (It links there to the policy WP:NOTNEWS which broadens it). The correct guideline being Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) where reviews like [34] are not routine, no. Widefox; talk 15:52, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
I didn't call that review you linked routine. wumbolo ^^^ 15:55, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
While picking minor faults in sourcing in these AfDs, you've lost the overview, which is you're way off, against consensus. Do you not see that? What's the sucssess rate and the approval from other editors? We don't agree. I think my !voting is 100% with consensus on these AfDs. That's that. Until the disruption is addressed by ANI, stop BLUDGEONING the process. Widefox; talk 16:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
So you're worried about voting with consensus, not with making good arguments? And my intention has never been to bludgeon, no need to ask me not to. wumbolo ^^^ 16:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
I never said that, complete straw man. My point being consensus is clear at these AfDs, and you're going against it. You seem to be plowing on with more AfDs, despite an active ANI with no sign of an end to this disruption. Widefox; talk 18:26, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Congrats. Widefox; talk 22:57, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:17, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Wogrammer

Wogrammer (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not believe this organisation meets WP:CORPDEPTH as I can find no substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. The article has been created by a single-purpose account with a likely conflict of interest. Considering it was founded in 2014, the organisation's website is feeble! Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 09:26, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 09:27, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep This organization is an established non-profit organization and has been featured in multiple sources including Huffington Post, CNN Money, Bustle, and referenced by tech executives. It is now linked from the Brogrammer page, since the name is a counter to the Brogrammer slang.
Comment The above comment was made by user:Techhistwriter, the creator of the article. The only other substantial editor of the article is user:Wogrammer, and I think we can assume that the latter is a CoI editor. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 13:32, 18 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. I recognise the sizable number of editors supported deletion on account of the utter lack of sources that this settlement exists, let alone is of sufficient character to justify an article. However, I was also persuaded by the remarks that the quarry is a red herring, because map co-ordinates are subject to an accuracy tolerance that may be obscuring a neighbouring settlement on the map. AGK [•] 19:42, 24 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Shahawat

Shahawat (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, fails WP:V. Pin points to a quarry!!! Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 09:23, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 09:24, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 09:24, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 09:24, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:49, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:17, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Yinainir

Yinainir (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, fails WP:V. Pin points to top of Jebel Jais which is where I'd like to put the whole bucket of these articles. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 09:22, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 09:22, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 09:22, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 09:22, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:49, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:17, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Wayb Hawf

Wayb Hawf (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, fails WP:V. Pin pints to Wadi Shaam. Nonsense. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 09:20, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 09:21, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 09:21, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 09:21, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:49, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Wad Wid

Wad Wid (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, fails WP:V. Pin points to town of Khatt. Nonsense. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 09:19, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 09:20, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 09:20, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 09:20, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:50, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Suhaybah

Suhaybah (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, fails WP:V and WP:Geosource. Pin points to village of Munay'i. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 09:18, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 09:18, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 09:18, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 09:18, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:50, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep and move per SportingFlyer. James500 ( talk) 14:27, 22 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Comment So you'll move an unsourced and not-notable article to a new name. Would it pass new article review? No. It's not notable and hasn't been mentioned by anyone anywhere, ever because it.is.not.notable. It's a suburb of Munay - itself a remote village and, just to add to the fun, Google Maps calls it Sahaynah. All of which is a really good reason to delete this until someone, somewhere, references this place in a work that WP recognises as a citeable, reliable source. Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 14:30, 22 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Sharyat

Sharyat (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND. Pin points to inland of village of Al Jeer Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 09:15, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 09:16, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 09:16, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 09:16, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:50, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:19, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Shariyah, Ras al-Khaimah

Shariyah, Ras al-Khaimah (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND. Pin points to village of Shawkha. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 09:13, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 09:14, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 09:14, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 09:14, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:51, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Due to low participation, this article may be undeleted on request at WP:REFUND. Mz7 ( talk) 07:10, 24 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Jamia Islamia Darul Uloom Madania

Jamia Islamia Darul Uloom Madania (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the article is unsourced, and the sources that are cited are abysmal: an entry on a telephone list, the school's dead website, and an internet forum post. I considered redirecting to the community, Jatrabari Thana, but there's nothing that sets this madrasa apart from the other 67 in the area. [38] (in Bengali) Indeed, although searches found passing mentions of Jatrabari Madrasa, [39] and of Jamia Islamia Darul Uloom Madania, [40] (in Bengali), no source is deep enough to tell whether the two names even represent the same school, as claimed. The bottom line is that subject does not meet WP:GNG, WP:ORGDEPTH, or WP:NSCHOOL. Worldbruce ( talk) 01:34, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce ( talk) 01:35, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce ( talk) 01:35, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:02, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Comment What is the significance of this place that it belongs in an encyclopedia? Freetheangels ( talk) 19:48, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply

  • Clean up This is very confusing. The official websites point to Majlis e Dawatul Haq Bangaldesh, which appears to be some kind of organization. pdf describing the Majlis (facebook) Then there's some event called "16th Markazi Ijtema '10 of Dawatul Haq Bangladesh" that is held at the school. [41] So is the article supposed to be about Majlis e Dawatul Haq Bangladesh or Jatrabari Madrasa? The informal directory by Yousuf Sultan suggests they are the same [42] but that isn't really a reliable source. The website has a list of madrasas [43] translation but this particular one isn't listed among them, unless there's yet another name for it. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 20:40, 3 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Atlantic306 ( talk) 17:18, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —AE ( talk • contributions) 09:02, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:20, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Shabakah

Shabakah (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, fails WP:V, WP:GEOLAND. Pin points to nowhere at all. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 08:58, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 09:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 09:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 09:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:51, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:20, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Sha'biyat Naslah

Sha'biyat Naslah (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a lingustic mixup - this page is a duplicate of Al Naslah. Arabic word Sha'biyat means 'community'. Pin points to Al Naslah. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 08:57, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:58, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:58, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:58, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:51, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:20, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Blockwash

Blockwash (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable Mccapra ( talk) 08:53, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:54, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:53, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Vexations ( talk) 11:46, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:20, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Sayh as Saqlah

Sayh as Saqlah (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND. Pin points to village of Huwaylat. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 08:44, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:50, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:50, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:50, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:51, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:20, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Sall, Ras al-Khaimah

Sall, Ras al-Khaimah (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced. Fails WP:V & WP:GEOLAND. Pin points to remote mountainside near Jebel Jais. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 08:42, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:43, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:43, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:43, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:51, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:21, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Salihiyah, Ras al-Khaimah

Salihiyah, Ras al-Khaimah (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, fails WP:V. Although there is a 'Salihia Mosque' nearby, this area is not even a recognised suburb of RAK City, where it is now located, in its own right. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 08:35, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:43, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:43, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:43, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:51, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:21, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Lon Rosen

Lon Rosen (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially-toned page on an unremarkable businessperson. Does not meet WP:ANYBIO; level of corporate advancement is not such as to presume notability. Sources are in passing and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/Download currently indef blocked for undisclosed paid editing. K.e.coffman ( talk) 07:45, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:21, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 03:25, 10 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:33, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 11:20, 24 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Peek-A-Boo Shahwaiz

Peek-A-Boo Shahwaiz (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not meet the notability guidelines per WP:TVSERIES because it was aired on a channel which fails WP:BROADCAST. This also fails WP:GNG Saqib ( talk) 13:37, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 14:49, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 14:49, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 13:30, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply
it was aired on a channel which fails WP:BROADCAST. -- Saqib ( talk) 07:47, 12 September 2018 (UTC) reply
No it is not a nationally broadcast channel. -- Saqib ( talk) 07:37, 21 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: discussion ongoing
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:33, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

*Keep as the series is making its root strong on WP:television and has viewership records on YouTube too. Series also meet guidelines for wikipedia WP:TVSERIES and broadcasts on national television. Lillyput4455 ( talk) 01:02, 18 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Please do not !vote keep twice. -- Saqib ( talk) 07:38, 21 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Has absolutely zero coverage AND sources making it not notable. WP:TVSERIES also says that despite the case that this one is a broadcast show in it's country In either case, however, the presence or absence of reliable sources is more definitive than the geographic range of the program's audience alone so it actually manages to fail that one. As I already said, due to no coverage, it fails WP:GNG. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 08:09, 20 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Yeah, Jovanmilic97 you're right but as the show has launched a month ago so not enough sources are available if I found any other than I will try to add it to it. Thanks! Lillyput4455 ( talk) 14:21, 20 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:22, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Sal Dora

Sal Dora (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, Fails WP:V. Pin points to area close to border crossing of Al Darah, likely a linguistically mixed-up duplicate. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 08:25, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:35, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:40, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:22, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Sa'abah

Sa'abah (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced. Fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND. Pin points nowhere. Google has a Sa'abah just over the border in Oman, but no online source verifies. The charming story about its name is also unsourced. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 08:20, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:35, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:35, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:35, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:40, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:22, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Rima, Ras al-Khaimah

Rima, Ras al-Khaimah (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND. Pin points to remote mountain area. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 08:12, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:36, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:36, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:36, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:41, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:22, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Quar Ah Qahlish

Quar Ah Qahlish (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND. Pin points near Ghalilah. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 07:45, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:38, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:38, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:38, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:41, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:29, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Qarat ad Dulm

Qarat ad Dulm (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND. Pin points to uninhabited area in RAK. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 07:43, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:37, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:37, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:37, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:41, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:29, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Qaf'ah

Qaf'ah (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, fails WP:V; WP:GEOLAND. Pin incorrectly points to Al Jeer. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 07:41, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:38, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:38, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:38, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:41, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:29, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Qabas

Qabas (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced; Fails WP:V; WP:GEOLAND. Pin points to township of Al Jeer. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 07:39, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:39, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:39, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:39, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:41, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:29, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Muraytah

Muraytah (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced. Fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND. Pin points to village of Ghayl. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 07:37, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:39, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:39, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:39, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:42, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:30, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Minha

Minha (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced. Fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND. Pin points to remote location on Dubai-Fujairah road. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 07:24, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:39, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:39, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:39, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:42, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:30, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Marhamid

Marhamid (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, fails WP:V; WP:GEOLAND. Pin points to village of Showka. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 07:16, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:40, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:40, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:40, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:42, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:30, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Manqashah

Manqashah (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced. Fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND. Pin points to remote location on Wadi Shaam. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 07:15, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:40, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:40, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:40, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:42, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:30, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Maghribiyah

Maghribiyah (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND. Pin points to mountain quarry. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 07:13, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:41, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:41, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:41, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:42, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:30, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Kub, Ras al-Khaimah

Kub, Ras al-Khaimah (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced. Fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND. Pin points to remote mountain area. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 07:09, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:41, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:41, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:41, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:42, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig ( talk) 08:13, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Harat 'Awali

Harat 'Awali (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced. Fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND. Pin points to remote mountain area near Wadi Shaam. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 06:28, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:42, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:42, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:42, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:43, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:30, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Khabakhib

Khabakhib (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced. Fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND. Pin points to remote mountain area. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 06:46, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:42, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:42, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:42, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:43, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:31, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Ham Ham

Ham Ham (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced. Fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND. Pin points to area of Digdaga in RAK where there is an Al Hamham Girl's School. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 06:26, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:32, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:32, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Also on this map: [45] SportingFlyer talk 06:18, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:43, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:43, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig ( talk) 08:11, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Gragrah

Gragrah (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced. Fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND. Pin points to area of Adhen village. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 06:21, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:44, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:44, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig ( talk) 08:10, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Ghubbat Khawrah

Ghubbat Khawrah (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced. Fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND. Pin points to remote area of Wadi Shaam. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 06:20, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:40, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:40, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:44, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:44, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig ( talk) 08:08, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Ghamarah

Ghamarah (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND. Pin points to area of Masafi. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 06:15, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:42, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:43, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:44, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:44, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig ( talk) 08:07, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Ghaghah

Ghaghah (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced. Fails WP:V and WP: GEOLAND. Pin points to remote mountain area. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 05:58, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

DYK Check reports 12 words. Sam Sailor 23:52, 20 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:42, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:43, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:44, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:44, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig ( talk) 08:05, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Ghadf

Ghadf (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced. Fails WP:V, WP:GEOLAND. Pin points to area of housing near named village of Daftah. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 05:56, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

DYK Check reports 9 words. Sam Sailor 23:48, 20 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:42, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:43, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:45, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:45, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig ( talk) 08:04, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Fa'y

Fa'y (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced. Fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND. Pin points to rural community of Sifuni. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 05:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

DYK Check reports 12 words . Sam Sailor 22:59, 20 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:44, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:44, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:45, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:45, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:31, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Y2Q

Y2Q (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable buzzword about Quantum supremacy; I'm not convinced there's anything here to merge or that this is the primary topic for this acronym. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 05:27, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:51, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Marketing buzzword attributed to nebulous "experts". (Pop-science pieces copying each other in the search for a catchy hook does not indicate that scientists actually care. Note that Google Scholar turns up nothing relevant for "years to quantum", a good indicator of who if anyone is actually saying this.) In no way does this merit an entire article; nor does the content appear merge-worthy. XOR'easter ( talk) 20:52, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig ( talk) 08:02, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Dihan

Dihan (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND. Pin points to urban area of RAK City between Kuzam and Dhait. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 05:09, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:45, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:45, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig ( talk) 08:01, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Difan

Difan (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced. Fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND. Pin points to area of Sidroh in RAK City. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 05:06, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:47, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. —AE ( talk • contributions) 08:47, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig ( talk) 07:59, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Dhad al Arab

Dhad al Arab (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, not notable, pin points to desert. Fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 05:03, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I'm not following all the details of how things developed during the three weeks this was running, but it looks like the pre-existing redlink problems have been resolved. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:11, 24 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Mankri

Mankri (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The first and third entries should be deleted per MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION. The creator asserts that there is some controversy over whether the second entry is called 'Mankri'; this is the only valid redirect target. I have tried redirecting it and moving it to be worked on in draftspace, but the creator repeatedly puts it back this way because they don't agree with MOS:DABMENTION. Agree or disagree, those are the guidelines, and leading readers to non-existent redlinks and blue links where they are not mentioned nor would it make sense for them to be mentioned, is not helpful. Disambiguation pages are indexes of information in Wikipedia articles - not a search engine like Google. Boleyn ( talk) 19:56, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Fwiw, I – the creator – don't disagree with DABMENTION, or any other style guideline. What I object to is for it to be narrowly interpreted and applied without the appreciation of nuance. – Uanfala (talk) 20:13, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala (talk) 20:15, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala (talk) 20:15, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala (talk) 20:15, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 12:00, 3 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 12:00, 3 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 12:56, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga ( talk) 04:41, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep I do not see why a better source is needed to verify Mankir in Uttar Pradesh. GNS approved the name as recently as 2015-08-20. The one in Rajasthan is well supported here. Is someone disputing the Burmese title? And yes I agree that a dab bluelink should mention the item and provide a citation to a source, but that can be remedied. See also Makri Population - Bulandshahar, Uttar Pradesh from the India 2011 Census. -- Bejnar ( talk) 08:40, 22 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig ( talk) 07:57, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Bayadir

Bayadir (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No modern reference to this area. Pin to 'tribal area' points to urban district in RAK city. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 04:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga ( talk) 04:37, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Screen One. already merged without opposition (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 17:03, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Down Among the Big Boys

Down Among the Big Boys (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources, no claim to notability, fails WP:GNG, WP:NFILM. It appears to have aired on BBC, and doesn't even have a Rotten Tomatoes page. signed, Rosguill talk 03:17, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga ( talk) 04:37, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga ( talk) 04:37, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:20, 24 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Bezalel (company)

Bezalel (company) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. The company itself doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:CORP. This article is about Bezalel, not its products. If Bezalel's Ark charger is a notable product, it should have its own article. —  Newslinger  talk 02:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

  • Analysis of sources in article:
    1. Crunchbase: Not significant coverage. Directory listing.
    2. USC Viterbi Magazine. Not independent. Desribes Bezalel as a "USC Viterbi startup". Founder is alumni from university, and participated in its startup program.
    3. Trend Hunter: Not significant. Passing mention.
    4. Geeky Gadgets: Not significant. Passing mention.
    5. Gadget Review: Not significant. Passing mention.
    6. Gadgetsin: Doesn't mention Bezalel at all.
    7. Bezalel: Not independent. Bezalel's own website.
    8. TechCrunch: Not significant. Passing mention.
    9. BuzzFeed: Doesn't mention Bezalel at all.
    10. PC Retail: Not significant. Passing mention.
    11. SiliconIndia: Not significant. Passing mention.
    12. USC Viterbi: Not independent. See #2.
    13. PR Newswire: Not independent. Press release from Bezalel.
    14. Rugged PC Review: Borderline. Very little information on the company itself.
    15. CSQ: Not significant. Passing mention of Bezalel in listicle with an entry for the company founder.
    16. Apple World Today: Not significant. Routine announcement.
    17. Business Insider: Not independent. Disclaimer at top of page: "The Insider Picks team writes about stuff we think you'll like. Business Insider has affiliate partnerships, so we get a share of the revenue from your purchase."
    18. Business Insider: Not independent. See #17.
    19. MilTech: Not significant. Passing mention.
I'm unable to find sources outside of the article that meet WP:CORPDEPTH. —  Newslinger  talk 02:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • This article was previously accepted through Articles for Creation. On September 15, I moved the article back to draft space and notified both the article creator and the reviewer. The reviewer informed me that it would be more appropriate to send the article to AfD than to move it back to draft space. —  Newslinger  talk 02:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:08, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:08, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:08, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Ko's Journey

Ko's Journey (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet the intent of the general notability guideline. Google is filled with not much in the way of independent, secondary, reliable sources, and the WP:VG/SE returns not a whole lot: Kotaku and Killscreen. The article also appears to have been started by the person running the company making the game. Izno ( talk) 01:49, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Izno ( talk) 01:50, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Izno ( talk) 01:50, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 01:30, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 14:54, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Grace Ueng

Grace Ueng (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person does not appear to meet the standards of the general notability guideline. What little I see out and about on the Internet (Google/Google News) is predominantly primary or lacks independence. The same for her business. Google Books is quiet and doesn't appear to have any significant treatment. Izno ( talk) 04:20, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 04:25, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 04:25, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 04:25, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 01:29, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:21, 24 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Computer History Wiki

Computer History Wiki (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The citations in this article do not reach to the level of significant coverage of the subject, rather they are just mentioned. I don't believe this meets the criteria of WP:N or WP:WEB. ... discospinster talk 17:20, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:26, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:27, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 01:26, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete As per nom. TH1980 ( talk) 02:48, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Author comment - Despite both having worked with the OS/8 operating system and on the Wikipedia OS/8 article, I hadn't looked at the Computer History Wiki ("CHWiki" for short) article on the subject until now. The Wikipedia article, alas, didn't even mention the "SQuish" command, just referring to
Quote option to compress ("squeeze") the filesystem so all unallocated space was moved to a single extent at the end of the disk. (endQuote)

No mention of the SQuish command itself. My oversight. Wikipedia oversight. CHWiki had it! That's just one example. Admittedly this is like IBM vs. The BUNCH, and the CHWiki people can continue, with or without notable writeups (and Wikipedia). Pi314m ( talk) 12:32, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply

edited OS/8 article re SQuish oversight. Pi314m ( talk) 15:33, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig ( talk) 07:55, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Haploys

Haploys (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, no coverage in independent sources. DferDaisy ( talk) 17:26, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:29, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:30, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 01:26, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Sandstein 11:21, 24 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Hojat Rahimi

Hojat Rahimi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL ( Persian: حجت رحیمی)

Afghan singer who fails WP:MUSICBIO. Nothing found in Persian language. Farhikht ( talk) 15:26, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:37, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:38, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:38, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:38, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Atlantic306 ( talk) 17:35, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 01:26, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:31, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

House of Valaya

House of Valaya (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot find independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources. References provided are either mentions-in-passing or rely almost exclusively on company produced material and/or quotations (fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND). Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA. Edwardx ( talk) 23:23, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:02, 10 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:03, 10 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:03, 10 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 01:24, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:31, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Zinio

AfDs for this article:
Zinio (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company still seems to be around, but looks like its business model never really took off. Not finding any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:NCORP. Edwardx ( talk) 23:37, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:01, 10 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:02, 10 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 01:24, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Agree with nom, I also couldn't find and references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, most references either discussed the product and not the company, or were based on company-connected sourcing. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing ++ 13:12, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:32, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Nikki and Nora

Nikki and Nora (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nomination (as nominator I'm neutral) as per Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_September_6#Nikki_and_Nora. The article itself was unilaterally converted into a redirect by an anon and was submitted by another to RfD. -- Lenticel ( talk) 01:19, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Pinging the following editors involved in the RfD: 74.89.42.17 ( talk · contribs); Thryduulf ( talk · contribs); AngusWOOF ( talk · contribs) -- Lenticel ( talk) 01:22, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Lenticel ( talk) 01:27, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:55, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:55, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Pilots that did not get picked up to series are not deemed notable just because they existed, or even because of what historic firsts they would have represented in the alternate universe where they had been picked up — notability depends on what something actually is, not on what it might have been if history had unfolded differently than it really did. There are still a few paths for an unsuccessful pilot to clear the notability test, such as going to air as a one-off television film or special and getting reliable source coverage on that basis — but AfterEllen is not strong enough sourcing to singlehandedly get a failed pilot over WP:GNG all by itself as the only source in play (especially given that the links are both dead.) Bearcat ( talk) 22:59, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Even if I put the pilot factor aside here as mentioned, it still does not have any reliable sources (most of what can be found are crowdfunding projects trying to kickstart with no proofs if they are even real or that they are reffered to the same project). Easily fails WP:GNG, nothing more to really add to the discussion. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 19:31, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Raebareli. It's unclear from reading this discussion, how much material should be merged, and what the exact name of the entity should be. I leave that up to whoever does the merge. Leave a redirect behind. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:17, 25 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Raebareli Municipal Corporation

Raebareli Municipal Corporation (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGCRITE. Page creator may have a conflict of interest. Rosguill talk 06:35, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:25, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:25, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply

@ Raebareli Area: If you would like to contest the deletion proposal, please do so here. Do not delete the WP:AFD tag from the article itself. Rosguill talk 17:27, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Merge to Raebareli seems best, given the limited content and stand-alone notability of the municipal corporation. Dl2000 ( talk) 20:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:59, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Speedy delete — As a hoax, Raebareli doesn't have a municipal corporation! Per the U. P. Municipal Corporation Act, 1959 (U. P. Act 2 of 1959) ( [46] and [47]), only areas having a population of 3  lakh (300 thousand) or more can have a municipal corporation, even then, the Uttar Pradesh government would've to constitute a corporation through a government notification. Also important to note is that a municipal corporation has: a mayor (politician, directly elected with mostly ceremonial powers) and a municipal commissioner (government career civil servant appointed by the state government), Raebareli lacks both of those. Further, this article seems to be more of a fluff piece than anything.
    Regards, SshibumXZ ( talk · contribs). 01:13, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
SshibumXZ I think your sole argument can be satisfied if the article is renamed to Municipality ? see this official source [48] and Nagar Palika.-- DBig Xrayᗙ 20:51, 22 September 2018 (UTC) reply
DBigXray, I know what a nagar palika (city council) is. If the page is moved to something it should be 'Raebareli Municipal Council'. However, Raebareli is not that big a city (the district is big, not the city), so, I don't think its municipal council deserves a separate Wikipedia entry. So, I would recommend redirecting the article to Raebareli#Civic administration per Vanamonde93. Regards, SshibumXZ ( talk · contribs). 09:56, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply
SshibumXZ There is no need to get offended. My comment was not to teach you what Nagarpalika is, but to inform you and other AfD contributors who see this page, that the entire argument that this is a hoax is invalid. Just because the title may be inappropriate is not the reason enough to call it a hoax and get the article speedily deleted when perfectly valid WP:ATD exists such as rename and merge.-- DBig Xrayᗙ 10:12, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Why Council and not Municipality ? I hope you do understand that Council is just a subset of the overall body known as Municipality or NagarPalika. Please read more here Municipal governance in India -- DBig Xrayᗙ 12:32, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply
DBigXray, nope, I don't know how you pulled that one, though. Municipal councils are a type of municipality, yes, but they are different from other municipalities in a lot of ways. In a district, there can be a lot of municipalities, viz., municipal corporations, municipal councils, city councils et al., they are all 'municipalities'. Having the article titled as 'municipality' would be ambiguous for reasons aforementioned. Please see: this, this, or the constitution (Part IXA, Article 243Q).
Quoting the constitution.

243Q.
1) There shall be constituted in every State,—
a) a Nagar Panchayat (by whatever name called) for a transitional area, that is to say, an area in transition from a rural ara to an urban area;
b) a Municipal Council for a smaller urban area; and
c) a Municipal Corporation for a larger urban area, in accordance with the provisions of this Part:...

Regards, SshibumXZ ( talk · contribs). 15:44, 24 September 2018 (UTC); edited 15:45, 24 September 2018 and 15:48, 24 September 2018 (UTC). reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:59, 25 September 2018 (UTC) reply

X-star Khueannai United F.C.

X-star Khueannai United F.C. (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A fifth-tier amateur Thai football club founded in 2015, references in the article are to seemingly unreliable sources, of them two being YouTube videos, one being a Facebook link and none being inline. Doesn't seem to satisfy WP:GNG, WP:ORG and—although it's an essay— WP:FOOTYN#Club notability.
Regards, SshibumXZ ( talk · contribs). 00:55, 16 September 2018 (UTC); edited 01:02, 16 September 2018 (UTC). reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.
Regards, SshibumXZ ( talk · contribs). 01:02, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions.
Regards, SshibumXZ ( talk · contribs). 01:02, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.
Regards, SshibumXZ ( talk · contribs). 01:02, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
Regards, SshibumXZ ( talk · contribs). 01:02, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
@ Aquaelfin: going by Google's machine-made translation of those links: the first one seems like a fluff piece and a PR interview, not to mentio, the source doesn't seem to be a reliable one; the second one is a press release by the Thai government, not enough stuff but still can be counted; and the third one seems to be both unreliable and not very informative.
Regards, SshibumXZ ( talk · contribs). 08:20, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Addendum — The fourth link is to a YouTube video, citing those is generally discouraged on Wikipedia.
Regards, SshibumXZ ( talk · contribs). 08:21, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
SshibumXZ Youtube video is not PR interview. It is Public local news. Ubon Ratchathani TV Aquaelfin ( talk) 9:14, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
International match in Dreams come true sports cup 2018 with Beijing Guoan U-14 and Guangzhou R&F U-14 in this link http://thainews.prd.go.th/website_th/news/news_detail/WNSPT6107110010004 and https://www.facebook.com/1470032569980267/photos/a.1471092873207570/2083654251951426/?type=3&theater
@ SportingFlyer: WP:FOOTYN is used football clubs don't join league and play in Thai FA Cup. A team that has never played a single match can have participated in this cup. such as Muangchang United don't join 2018 Thailand Amateur League but this team can play 2018 Thai FA Cup. Aquaelfin ( talk) 4:40, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig ( talk) 07:51, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Bayesian regret

AfDs for this article:
Bayesian regret (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page appears to be largely unchanged from the version that was deleted in 2006. Appears to be a clear case of WP:OR, with one paper (by Smith) as the primary reference. Also appears to be an attempt to promote range voting over other voting systems, which would violate WP:NPOV. I am confused as to why this article was created in the first place - it was declined through WP:AFC and was eligible for speedy deletion. Then some user came along, re-submitted the article, and immediately accepted it. -- Oneforfortytwo ( talk) 18:29, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:46, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Izno ( talk) 19:51, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • comment GScholar gives a hundred-forty-odd hits over a variety of fields, including this paper which defines the term on the fly. I gather there is a certain low grade interest in the idea. The article as it stands is pretty poor, though. Mangoe ( talk) 20:55, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:43, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:32, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Matthew Peterson

AfDs for this article:
Matthew Peterson (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet biographical notability. The references are a mixture of mere mentions, vanity listings, and press releases. Google search turns up that there are other Matthew Peterson's and Matthew Petersen's. Robert McClenon ( talk) 00:25, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga ( talk) 04:39, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga ( talk) 04:39, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2018_September_16&oldid=1142224383"

Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE