Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< 30 September 2 October >

Purge server cache

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There's clearly no consensus to delete Limey (UK '70s band), but there's a broad consensus to not keep the album articles, so I shall redirect those to the band article. Before doing that, I will move the article to the more standard Limey (band). A Train talk 06:58, 9 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Silver Eagle (Limey album)

Silver Eagle (Limey album) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUM. Discogs is not a reliable source and a WP:BEFORE search did not bring up anything that could help this pass the notability guidelines for albums. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 23:59, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Cabayi ( talk) 06:40, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Cabayi ( talk) 06:40, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Cabayi ( talk) 06:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
@ Duffbeerforme: could you please explain what you mean by their "pedigree"? Engel's most notable group was the New Seekers, but that was after he was in Limey, and well after the New Seekers' period of chart success (he was in the band from 1978 to 1982). As far as I know, he has never appeared on a chart hit with any group during his career. Kewley is slightly more notable, having been in the Q-Tips with Paul Young, and then co-writing songs with Young and playing keyboards on his first three solo albums. But I'm not sure that's enough for him to pass WP:MUSICBIO, and again, that was after he was in Limey. Richard3120 ( talk) 12:09, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
@ Richard3120: that was a comment that it should be looked at, I hadn't had a full look. To expand on your comments. Before or after Limey is irrelevant. Kewley was notable enough to get his own entry in The Guinness encyclopedia of popular music, Colin Larkin, Guinness Pub., 1995 (reproduced here). Engel was also in (amongst others) Mandrake Paddel Steamer, also given an entry in The Guinness encyclopedia of popular music, [1] "responsible for recording one of the most cherished singles of the psychedelic era". For information this has more on Engel (but is a primary, non independent source). Regardless they still satisfy WP:MUSIC with two albums through a BIG label. duffbeerforme ( talk) 12:21, 3 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Thanks - that looks like it'll be enough to save the group's article, still need some work to justify the album articles (see below). Richard3120 ( talk) 12:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Yep. !vote is for the band only. Unless reviews are found there is no point on keeping the album articles. Everything found so far worth covering can be in the bands article. duffbeerforme ( talk) 13:08, 3 October 2017 (UTC) reply
I'll have a look in the British Library next week in copies of NME, Melody Maker and Sounds - it's a little tricky establishing when the two albums were released, but I think they were in the last quarter of 1975 and first couple of months of 1977. I don't believe it's 100% certain they would have been reviewed, but there's a good chance. Richard3120 ( talk) 12:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC) reply
"Silver Eagle" single looks like 11 Mar 1977. duffbeerforme ( talk) 13:15, 3 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 05:27, 9 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Tre-8

Tre-8 (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:MUSICBIO. One charted song. No secondary sources (except obituaries) to support notability. Magnolia677 ( talk) 22:59, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:59, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 08:02, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 05:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Promotional Tool

AfDs for this article:
Promotional Tool (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previous Afd Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Promotional Tool attracted no comments. Dysklyver 22:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:26, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:27, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The episode list should be merged into the article until such time as someone comes up with a proper set of summaries. Primefac ( talk) 14:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

List of Story of the Alps: My Annette episodes

List of Story of the Alps: My Annette episodes (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Story of the Alps: My Annette (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Not a notable anime series, fails WP:GNG as unsourceable. Article is sourced entirely to a unreliable source - a website similar to Imdb. a brief WP:BEFORE has not revealed enough any reliable sources to rescue it with. Dysklyver 22:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

A Den Jentyl Ettien Avel Dysklyver, are you intending to nominate only the list of episodes, or do you intend on nominating the series itself as well? It reads like you intend to delete the article on the series, but you've nominated the episode list. Primefac ( talk) 22:30, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
I have not figured out how to include multiple articles in the AfD yet, but yes I am trying to do both. Dysklyver 22:36, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Cool. I added the series here, as I see you've put up the AFD notice on the page. Primefac ( talk) 22:40, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Dysklyver 22:40, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Dysklyver 22:40, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Dysklyver 22:40, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 03:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- Michitaro ( talk) 07:36, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:34, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Patrick Haseldine

AfDs for this article:
Patrick Haseldine (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor diplomat who had some temporary notoriety. Not notable. Philafrenzy ( talk) 21:51, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:34, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Justine Kathryn Kolata

Justine Kathryn Kolata (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No relevance for Wikipedia. Seems like a current student with very limited professional experience who has founded a student club with some of her friends. Fails WP:BIO, partly written as WP:PROMO and lacks WP:CS in areas of personal information. -- DonJusto123 ( talk) 07:59, 23 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 03:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:02, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:34, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Jerusalem Boys Choir

AfDs for this article:
Jerusalem Boys Choir (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability has been discussed (see talk) without conclusion. Promised references have not appeared. I was personally not able to find any significant coverage of this choir. ~ Kvng ( talk) 21:45, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Murmansk Philharmonic Orchestra

Murmansk Philharmonic Orchestra (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article contains no secondary sources, nor can I see any criterion from WP:NMUSIC met for this orchestra. Presumably, if any sources exist they will likely be in Russian, but I have tried to search for sources in English and Russian, and come up with nothing. — Bilorv (talk) (c) (e) 20:50, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Weak Keep I presume that Russian-language sources exist. Most cities of this prominence in the English-speaking world have pages for their orchestras (three chosen at random include Tulsa, Leeds, Spokane), and the primary sources are sufficient for verifiability. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 19:43, 4 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep A search of Russian sources reveals some basic stuff, I suspect there is more offline / as books, but I can't prove it one way or the other because neither Gbooks or my university do Russian books. The orchestra itself is quite new, established in 1975, however the have been decorated with the (very high honor) Order for Merit for the Fatherland 2nd class, and have played internationally with the Norwegian National Opera. They are a relevant official state-funded regional orchestra with their own 600 seat music hall, a good selection of notable members and participation in major events, often with other groups, not just in Russia but in Europe as well. Dysklyver 23:38, 7 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Vince Thompson

Vince Thompson (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod fails WP:SIGCOV , WP:NAUTHOR and WP:BIO.Selling his stock does not make one notable. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 20:08, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 20:30, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 20:30, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 06:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Poq

Poq (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article with almost no indication of significance,. That it's used by a small number of retailers just means "it exists" The awards are minor (and 2 of the 5 aren't even awards). The references are either PR or just notice-- or , like the Forbes, just mentions in a few words as one of many startups in an area. . DGG ( talk ) 19:27, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:43, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric ( talk) 09:48, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Quantasia Sharpton

Quantasia Sharpton (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A woman known for ... well something you won't read about in broadsheet newspapers. The sources are typical WP:BLPSOURCES violating tabloid fodder, and a search for alternatives reveals the same. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:18, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 00:22, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 03:03, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • I would have thought that this pretty exactly meets the headline of WP:G10, "Pages that disparage, threaten, intimidate, or harass their subject or some other entity, and serve no other purpose". What other purpose does this page, sourced to tabloids, serve? 86.17.222.157 ( talk) 21:07, 4 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Delete - this seems a classic case of WP: BLP1E, added to which, the article is written in very bad English. Vorbee ( talk) 07:59, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep with caveat. That is, a merger discussion can still be held at the talk page. Just not outright deletion. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Heather Veitch

AfDs for this article:
Heather Veitch (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability except for JC's Girls, which already contains the necessary biographical information about her. I do not see any evidence that she was of any particular notability in her previous career. Possible redirect. DGG ( talk ) 19:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 02:56, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 02:56, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:59, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:59, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
at the very least perhaps we can at least remove some of the duplication. The article on her df\does not need to do more than mention the organization, and vice-versa. Doingmorethan that is saying everything twice,and is a promotional technique, no matter whether or not there is notability . DGG ( talk ) 02:17, 3 October 2017 (UTC) reply
We can also start an editing policy forum to take on such discussions.  We can call it AfEP (Articles for Editing Policy).  The forum here is AfD.  Unscintillating ( talk) 03:04, 3 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

PatesTapes

PatesTapes (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Sourced to twitter, facebook and a currently non-existant site (can't judge). Kleuske ( talk) 19:00, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:27, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Jehangir Saifullah Khan

Jehangir Saifullah Khan (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough sources to pass WP:GNG. Delete it or redirect it to Saif Group. Greenbörg (talk) 18:37, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:24, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:24, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. A valid rationale for deletion has not been presented. For examples of valid deletion rationales, see WP:DEL-REASON. North America 1000 12:19, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Grockit

Grockit (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This company no longer exists. It was purchased and then retired (see https://twitter.com/Grockit/status/780564872966840320), and there is no longer a website or any reference to it still existing. Transmissionelement ( talk) 18:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:18, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:18, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Mayor Boss

Mayor Boss (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was a member of a seemingly notable musical group, per WP:NOTINHERITED, that doesn't translate to him having a seperate article. He needs to make a name for himself first by passing WP:MUSICBIO before he can be deemed notable. I will provide a more comprehensive reference analysis soon. So there is basically nothing reliably independent on the subject from Google. Sorry, there is even nothing at all. So I went to the article and it is filled with 90% unreliable sources, forum sites, such as Nairaland, Gistmania, etc are used. Soundclound is even cited lol. The only two sources that meets WP:RS doesn't even cover the artiste, this and this are just announcement about something else, doesn't meet notability criteria in any way. Darreg ( talk) 17:54, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:09, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:09, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. No doubt this discussion would have ended in deletion anyway, but the article was created by a block-evading editor, and was substantially the same as the previously deleted one, so we don't need to wait. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 16:50, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Milly Kay

AfDs for this article:
Milly Kay (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am not convinced this meets WP:MUSICBIO. Should even qualify for speedy delete, the only keep vote from a previous nom was from a blocked sock. Article creator follows the same pattern as the one Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaydex (creates on draft then move to mainspace), likely another sock. That is even besides the strong non-notability of the artiste. Again, another 2010s unremarkable NG artiste aiming to use WP to promote his career. Darreg ( talk) 17:33, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:06, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:06, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 18:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Daniel Doll-Steinberg

Daniel Doll-Steinberg (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. reddogsix ( talk) 17:28, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 17:49, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 17:49, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 18:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Jason Chee Pei Kun

Jason Chee Pei Kun (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG, relies on blog posts, forum posts, dead links. Probably a self-promotional article given the level of detail (education path, address) on such a minor figure. starship .paint ~ KO 14:06, 23 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Mark the train Discuss 15:51, 23 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bodybuilding-related deletion discussions. Mark the train Discuss 15:51, 23 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: notified major contributor ParkSL86 on talk page starship .paint ~ KO 06:18, 30 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 05:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC) reply

List of TOME: Terrain of Magical Expertise characters

List of TOME: Terrain of Magical Expertise characters (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pure WP:FANCRUFT with insufficient references. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 17:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 02:52, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 02:52, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 00:48, 3 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 00:48, 3 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Comment the main TOME: Terrain of Magical Expertise article is also tagged with a copyvio that requires cleanup AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 01:01, 3 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Comment My people of Wikipedia. I understand that many of the info is copied from TOME's article. My plan is to try to clean up as much data as I can to include factual original writings. But I'm pleading with you to allow me time to do so. This project may not be straight to the top, but TOME is legitimately crowdfunded, featured many involvement of anime voice over actors and is currently getting a video game adaption based on it, and people need to know the characters as well as the people who portrayed them. A lot of personal writing has also been implanted on the characters such as Rockoon, whom Mack eventually wrote for the character and Rocky was given a whole new meaning of character that was the influence of Mack's personal ideas. I agree that this is very lackluster but I'm trying my hard to make all edits as efficient. All I ask is for you guys to help me comply with it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeanutButterMarshmallowTime ( talk • contribs) 01:21, 3 October 2017 (UTC) reply
I would suggest reducing the character list to just the main ones and then you can put it into the main article. Not every character needs to be mentioned, especially the guest ones. Please also read MOS:TVCAST and WP:NOTWIKIA. They don't need to be that detailed. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 02:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC) reply
I guess I over-did it with the one time characters. But characters that made more than one appearance, especially those that are signifigant to the story, should have some mention; like Dijiri (Dave Smith)'s character. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeanutButterMarshmallowTime ( talk • contribs) 03:55, 3 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Guest characters over a short story arc (2-3 episodes in a row) should not be listed either. They have to be recurring regulars or main/starring characters. Also please work on the TOME article itself in the Draft. It needs a lot of copyvio cleanup. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 07:33, 3 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Seems like we have some unrefuted claims of notability. Personal attacks and the like would be a topic for WP:HAPPYPLACE Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Robert Mason (cricketer)

Robert Mason (cricketer) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one "source" that's just an entry in a database for a BLP. Does not seem to meet WP:ATHLETE requirements for cricketers at all. (Apologies if this is a mistagged AfD - I wasn't sure if it should be "Games or sports" or "Biographical".) Nerd1a4i ( talk) 17:00, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Comment - okay, so this WP:ONESOURCE thing is becoming an issue all of a sudden. All you need to do is request that another source be added and that will do fine. If I do that now, does that negate the need for this AfD? Bobo . 17:08, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - a second link has been added, rendering the justification for sending this article to AfD meaningless. Bobo . 17:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Mark the train Discuss 17:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Mark the train Discuss 17:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Mark the train Discuss 17:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Comment – This is a tricky one. Every Gnews search I do comes up with stuff about other people. Despite (from my understanding) failing WP:NCRIC, it seems to be status quo to have articles about these players (see this list), and he played in two List A matches, which is more than some other people on that list. Does anyone here stand in this field of expertise? J 947( c) ( m) 18:22, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
How do you read NCRIC such that you believe this individual doesn't meet NCRIC? One appearance in a major cricket match. This individual meets that criterion. Bobo . 18:42, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Read criterion 1 wrong. Still neutral though, as a balance between the result of this RfC and the fact that it would be unfair to delete just this one while leaving all the others intact. J 947( c) ( m) 19:02, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Keep – Meets GNG as shown by sources found. J 947( c) ( m) 20:08, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • More time - more time needs to be provided to search for reliable, in-depth sources about this chap. It appears he played for Cleator CC and probably continues to play for Cumberland by the sounds of articles such as this and this. I would query whether that is necessarily in-depth, but my thinking is that there is likely to be more coverage in the regional press which has a chance of establishing notability (certainly for players in my part of the world I would consider this likely). It is reasonable to allow more time to be provided to search for sources where a sportsman meets the sports notability guidelines - in order to show that they meet the GNG. It is a shame that the article creator did not consider searching for news sources and has instead relied upon merely statistical sources which show that the chap existed and little else. Given that it took me less than five minutes to find those above it seems odd that an article creator couldn't be bothered to do so. Perhaps that would have avoided this going to AfD entirely. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 19:28, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Apart from meeting WP:NCRIC by playing two List A matches, there's coverage in various local press [8], [9], [10], including this which mentions he was the Under-21 player of the year. Tons more like this by searching for his name in quotes and add the words Cumberland + cricket with that. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 19:29, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Comment. It's no good having the sources in an External Links section. They MUST be inline citations. This is where we go wrong and why so many of these AfDs appear, per the Sri Lankan one earlier. I'm not fixing this one. Jack | talk page 21:44, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
That's a difficult one to answer, Bobo. I would say we need something at the end of the opening sentence because it's here that we are confirming the player's status at top-level. If it's feasible to include a citation after a match summary then, yes, go for that too (I did that for Dinaparna as we have the full scorecard). Nothing to forgive, btw. All the best. Jack | talk page 12:28, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
See I would have thought that the only reference needed would be the fact that this individual is a top level player. Which is what we already do by providing the external link. If we would rather this external link be a reference, so we kill two birds with one stone, that is fine. Bobo . 12:33, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
H'mmm, no. Per WP:EL and WP:CITE, information in the narrative must be verified by an inline citation while links within the EL section are actually "additional reading" only. The EL is not a citation. It's exactly like citing inline a page in Wisden for a specific piece of information and then putting the same year's Playfair annual, which doesn't say anything about the player, into EL as further reading about the season. Jack | talk page 13:51, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
I understand. All it is, is just another easily fixable problem which is better sorted by cleanup tags than sending things willy-nilly to AfD just to adhere to WP:POINT. Bobo . 15:58, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Oh, I absolutely agree. I tag things all the time and I hold the world record for application of {{refimprove}}. The problem is disruptive individuals (many of them) who cannot think in terms of "improvement needed here" and just do a knee-jerk towards AfD by default. Jack | talk page 18:57, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Not strictly speaking. You're blaming Frankenstein's monster. Not Frankenstein himself. The fact that these people don't even consider fixing the problems themselves proves that they have no interest in attempting to improve the encyclopedia. But I see what you mean. Bobo . 19:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
This is the fourth time (I think) that an article I created has gone to AfD recently where the prose content of the article has not changed in the eight years since I created the article. Not a criticism, John, just a frustration. I added as much prose content then as I could, and nobody has added to it since. Once again this is proof that it's not us as WP:CRIC members who are at fault for this, but those who randomly turn up eight years later and declare WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Couldn't these people have done so eight years ago?! Would have avoided this mess and the others...
I would say that if an article has survived eight years without being criticized by way of an AfD, then it's probably fine as it is... (with reference to its presence on WP, not necessarily its prose content). Bobo . 11:46, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Sorry. Meant no criticism of you (or anyone else in this). Just saying that I've now put in the very basic refs and that the earlier contributions above indicate there are at least local newspaper references that could flesh this out further. Johnlp ( talk) 09:17, 3 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Sorry, I misphrased, I didn't take it that way at all. My criticism certainly wasn't directed towards you - more that I was tickled at the fact that the article has been in the same state for the last eight years and suddenly someone has rocked up and decided they don't like it. The fact that their opinion goes against basic guidelines is frankly disruptive. Bobo . 10:10, 3 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - worth noting that this discussion is being accompanied by significant veiled personal attacks - not all directed towards me, but towards unnamed uninvolved parties - by a certain user on WT:CRIC, which are completely independent of either this article or this AfD debate. I refuse to be provoked by his behaviour, as I have been before out of my own frustration. I have learned from my mistakes. Telling me to "go jump in a lake" is frankly beyond the pale. Spike 'em claims that I am instructing him "which articles to edit" and that I am taking this "far too personally", both of which are outright lies.
Once again these complaints go beyond the sole concern pointed out on this AfD, which has no relation to either WP:GNG or WP:CRIN but WP:ONESOURCE, are therefore irrelevant to this conversation, and unprovoked by myself or @ BlackJack:. Bobo . 02:25, 3 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Meets SNG, so we presume sources exist. For me, one of two things should happen for SNG to carry - non-English subject (really non-Latin language subject) or historical subject (to me, five years; but others have said ten years or pre-Internet (about 1997)). Here we have the second. Websites don't keep content up forever. Searching for older subjects can be challenging through the Internet. Had someone raised this back in 2009, we maybe could have found the sources. Now, they are going to be very hard to find in view of the prime of 2002-3. So the presumption carries weight and we should keep. RonSigPi ( talk) 00:38, 6 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy merge to History of the World Wide Web. There is clearly no desire to delete this article despite its truly terrible title -- presumably because it's a broadly plausible search term. There is already a mention of Tim Berners-Lee's work creating the CERN site in History of the World Wide Web, the redirect target proposed by the nominator and others, so I will redirect the article there. The history will still be available if an editor wishes to incorporate it at the target article. A Train talk 22:52, 5 October 2017 (UTC) reply

First website ever made

First website ever made (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short article that should be deleted/merged with History of the World Wide Web. (Note: the "merge discussion" the page is tagged with doesn't seem to exist.) Notable topic, but there isn't much to say about it, and it fits quite well into an already existant article. Nerd1a4i ( talk) 16:56, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Mark the train Discuss 17:22, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Mark the train Discuss 17:22, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:57, 5 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Clarification, because this discussion seems to have morphed into the merge/redirect discussion that should have taken place at Talk:History of the World Wide Web, or the merge/redirect should have been WP:BOLDly performed. My "speedy keep" opinion expressed above was not on the basis that I think this should be kept as a seperate article, which I don't because this is an encyclopedia rather than the Guinness Book of Records, but simply that there was no need to go through the drama of an AfD discussion to achieve the obvious outcome. 86.17.222.157 ( talk) 19:23, 5 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Glenn Jones

Glenn Jones (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to meet musician notability requirements. The article is a BLP with only one source that doesn't even support any of the admittedly few grasps at notability the article makes. Nerd1a4i ( talk) 16:36, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Mark the train Discuss 17:17, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:SNOW Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:08, 3 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Mona Wilson

Mona Wilson (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She wrote one book and was "civil servant" - as in, she worked at an insurance commission. Only three references, one of which is just an index entry, another which is a dictionary of british women (so not much about specifically her), and the third of which is the book she wrote. Does not seem to meet notability requirements. Nerd1a4i ( talk) 16:23, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 16:28, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 16:28, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 02:43, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 05:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Slater Investments Limited

Slater Investments Limited (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to meet WP:CORP. Nerd1a4i ( talk) 16:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Mark the train Discuss 16:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mark the train Discuss 16:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Mark the train Discuss 16:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 05:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC) reply

BVS Performance Solutions

BVS Performance Solutions (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company, fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Lack of coverage in reliable sources. — Za wl 15:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 16:12, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 16:12, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Brendan Leonard

Brendan Leonard (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertorially toned WP:BLP of an actor and (purported) filmmaker. This stakes his notability as an actor on a shortlived television series that doesn't have an article (although it does at least verify as having existed), and the filmmaker claims are vagued out as "working with his family's production company" while not actually specifying what his role with the company is (and therefore not necessarily making him an actual filmmaker...he could be a production accountant for all I can actually verify anywhere). And the closest there is to actual referencing for any of it is the external links: IMDb and his own self-published primary source content about his own endeavours, none of which count as notability-contributing sources at all. So I'd be willing to withdraw this if somebody with better archival access to US media than I've got can actually dig out real reliable source coverage about him and his shortlived TV show from 2003 -- but I can confirm that he hasn't stayed the subject of any recent reliable source media coverage that shows up in a Google News search: I get hits for other unrelated people named Brendan Leonard, but none for anybody I can properly verify as being this one unless we count one "where are they now" blurb on TMZ. (Not, just to clarify, that Wikipedia requires coverage of him to stay current per se — but we do require coverage of him to be shown, and can't keep a BLP just because somebody presumes that older coverage probably exists somewhere if nobody's looked for any.) Bearcat ( talk) 15:30, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 16:18, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 16:18, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Jahmirris C. Smith

Jahmirris C. Smith (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSIC. Lack of coverage in reliable sources. Most sources are primary, unreliable and/or trivial. — Za wl 15:23, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 16:15, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 16:15, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 16:15, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The sole keep argument is a bare assertion; the delete argument has more to offer. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Matt Brewer

Matt Brewer (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician. Fails WP:MUSIC and WP:GNG. Lack of coverage in reliable sources. — Za wl 15:14, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Dimitra Korri

Dimitra Korri (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable figure skater. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 14:38, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 02:27, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 02:27, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 02:27, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:19, 9 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Radio Lumbini

Radio Lumbini (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only independent, reliable sources that give meaningful coverage to the station that I can find are this and this, both of which give little coverage to the station itself and focus on the rejuvenation of Nepalese radio in general. The latter does detail some information about the station but not in anywhere near as much depth as is needed for a Wikipedia article. DrStrauss talk 14:32, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:03, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:03, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:03, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. Articles on broadcast radio stations in the Anglophone West are invariably kept, even without sources such as those linked by the nominator which pretty obviously constitute significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Why treat a radio station in Nepal any differently? Is this an encyclopedia about only English speakers? Or maybe about only white Western people? 86.17.222.157 ( talk) 21:55, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
I don't see any mention of "race". Whatever meaning that construct has, it doesn't mean "non-Anglophone". DGG ( talk ) 01:21, 4 October 2017 (UTC) reply
@ DGG: the user has struck white from their sentence. "White" is often used to describe Caucasian people, therein lies the racial element. DrStrauss talk 15:15, 4 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Terrestrial radio broadcast stations that can be verified to exist are generally notable. [27] is a master's thesis on the station. power~enwiki ( π, ν)
  • Keep We normally do keep broadcast stations, despite the recognition that it is difficult to find material that satisfies the requirements of the GNG. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG ( talk • contribs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) DrStrauss talk 11:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply

William Edward Haesche

William Edward Haesche (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Search for sources reveals no indication of significance per WP:ANYBIO or WP:MUSICBIO. DrStrauss talk 14:31, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:27, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Toy Commander

Toy Commander (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NGAME and WP:GNG. Received ratings from game sites but no significant commentary.

Also nominating the game's extension:

Toy Racer (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) — Za wl 14:02, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 14:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Toy Commander. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

No Cliché

No Cliché (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Lack of coverage in reliable sources. — Za wl 13:42, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 13:52, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 13:52, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The neologism/phenomenon question needs to be hashed out on the talkpage. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Little Fresh Meat

Little Fresh Meat (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article feels like a WP:COATRACK for a Chinese neologism (xiaoxianrou) with multiple translations. The more general topic is of young male celebrities in China; a rename may be appropriate if there's no existing page on that topic. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 00:43, 24 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 06:19, 24 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 06:19, 24 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 06:19, 24 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 13:10, 25 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Za wl 13:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 05:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Dream A Dream (NGO)

Dream A Dream (NGO) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable charitable organization. A Google search revealed no independent in-depth coverage from reliable independent sources. From the 4 external links the first is not a reliable source, the second is only a passing mention and the last 2 are perma-dead links (Guidestar India seems to be a charity listing, not a reliable independent source). Aside from this basic problem, the entire article is full of non-neutral unencyclopedic language and excessive self-sourced details from COI editors. GermanJoe ( talk) 12:54, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 12:58, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 12:58, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete -- Fails WP:V. Appears on lists and mirrors, but no profiles in independent reliable sources. Written by a SPA who appears to have a close relation with subject. Rhadow ( talk) 15:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doesn't even pass the WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES test. ansh 666 05:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Nasah Montessori Center for Learning Inc.

Nasah Montessori Center for Learning Inc. (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable school with nothing more than routine coverage (directory-style listings, etc.). Edgeweyes ( talk) 12:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Request for comment: previously, all schools were presumed to be notable, I don't know whether this was an explicit policy or guideline but WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES was often cited. I believe this has now been overridden by an RfC which took place when I was on a wikibreak but I'm not sure. Could a clued-up user tell me whether this is the case please? DrStrauss talk 14:04, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
It has never been the case that all schools have been considered notable. For the last 8 years or so, essentially all secondary schools with a demonstrable real physical existence have in practice been determined at AfD to be notable (a recent AfD said both that there was no consensus to merely refer to CommonOutcomes but also no consensus to change the practice of considering them notable). For the same 8 years, no primary or intermediate school of tutoring academy has been considered notable at AfD unless there were clear specific factors of notability, and very few such schools have been found to eet them.
It is my understanding that Montessori schools are usually primary or primary-intermediate, though secondary Montessori schools do exist. There is no information in this article to give the nature of this school--and there are no references to show real existence. Their web site [36] and [37] says they have high school classes, but the only evidence of this is a photo on the site of what appear to be high school students. However, I can find no sources whatsoever for the school besides their own website and social media pages, and inclusion on several list of schools. The question here is, what are our standards for real existence. DGG ( talk ) 18:55, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete by Magog the Ogre. Reason: G5: Creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban. ( non-admin closure) Mr. Magoo ( talk) 20:32, 3 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Kingsley Eno Osagie

Kingsley Eno Osagie (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason Samat lib ( talk) 12:08, 1 October 2017 (UTC) Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion name = Winning Jah ) reply 

however  notability criteria still not meet , Notability still not found  --
Samat lib (
talk) 
12:08, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
reply

however this article requires Speedy deletion tags . but i cant found the tag here . please can someone help fast as soon as possible . Samat lib ( talk) 12:17, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply 

               the website page  can be consider as a promotional page by the person
               related to this article here is the sources.
              
[1] the soundcloud page here has JUST 2 FOLLOWERS 
               
Kingsley_Eno_Osagie known as Winning jah is the  2 followers


  • Comment - the sources provided on the article are not WIKIPEDIA reliable sources .
                most of the sources are from crappy website for self promotion reason.
  • Comment - the article says his album “Nouveau Business” sold over 1 million units at Alaba International Market ?
               please we need sources for verification about that paragraph. ( reliable  sources needed )
  • Comment - this article has no changes from the past article of him that was Deleted .
                 The article  Fails.
WP:BIO also Fails 
WP:GNG  
Samat lib (
talk) 
10:35, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
reply


Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 13:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 13:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 13:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

References

  1. ^ https://soundcloud.com/officialnigeriareggaechart
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 03:17, 9 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Eino Leino Prize

Eino Leino Prize (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable prize award, named after a Finnish author. Lack of coverage, no indication of notability and has only passing mentions. Many author bio notability claims are based only on this prize. — Za wl 11:24, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. ~ Hydronium~Hydroxide~ (Talk)~ 01:08, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. ~ Hydronium~Hydroxide~ (Talk)~ 01:08, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. ~ Hydronium~Hydroxide~ (Talk)~ 01:08, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Aygün Kazımova discography favoring the more specific target. ansh 666 05:32, 9 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Aygün (album)

Aygün (album) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUM, could not find any third party sources XFhumu Talk 11:02, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Mario Lucia

AfDs for this article:
Mario Lucia (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN hockey player who fails NHOCKEY. Assertions in the previous AfD (by the article creator, someone subsequently community banned from new article creation) that he meets the GNG are just plain false; the sources listed are almost all blogsites, routine sports coverage explicitly debarred from notability by WP:ROUTINE, or not independent of the subject. Ravenswing 10:52, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 10:58, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alaska-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 10:58, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 03:13, 9 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Delirio (band)

Delirio (band) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · (band) Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band. Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO, lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. — Za wl 09:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

@ Zawl: Before AFDing in future I suggest you always check article histories. This article sadly was hijacked in 2011. It's a 1944 Argentine film, that was how it was created and has sources in books.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:15, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Agreed but as of now, the article is about the band. The hijacking wasn't appropriate but the article was still an unreferenced one-sentence stub. — Za wl 10:22, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

[41] [42] Can't find much more than that at present.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:07, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:19, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:19, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:19, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: fails WP:BAND. I'm really struggling to find any coverage of this band after playing the local "Monterey Live" festival in 2009 - after this date their Facebook page has just four further posts (the last in 2012) and their Twitter feed just one. Article is the sole Wikipedia edit by "Edgarescobedo1978", which just happens to be the name and birth year of the band's lead singer. It doesn't help that the band name is so unoriginal (I've found bands named Delirio in Mexico, Argentina and Uruguay), but even if they're still active, they never appeared to have attained any notability outside of their local scene, and it's not clear whether they ever completed their debut album - recording began in 2009, but it was still ongoing by 2012 when their social media posts stopped. They're certainly nowhere near as well known as Maná or Los Enanitos Verdes, two extremely well known and successful Latin rock bands mentioned in the article text. Richard3120 ( talk) 12:13, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

PS @ MassiveYR: you've made an error in the deletion sorting - it should be California, not North Carolina. Richard3120 ( talk) 12:13, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

@ Richard3120: Thanks, must have misclicked. MassiveYR ♠ 12:53, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Delete Per nom and Richard, only found those two Monterey sources.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:40, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Delete A non-notable California band.-- Dthomsen8 ( talk) 21:20, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Comment My thanks to bd2412 T for some good work on a tangled situation.-- Dthomsen8 ( talk) 21:36, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Yiolanda Koppel

Yiolanda Koppel (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. Fails WP:GNG, lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. — Za wl 09:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 09:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 09:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 00:27, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Additional factors: BLP with no sources. Written by SPA whose 2nd edit was to create this article. Difficult to find anything that is not FaceBook/YouTube/Twitter ephemera. Agricola44 ( talk) 03:39, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 05:32, 9 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Ali Salami

Ali Salami (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person is not notable. His page on Persian Wikipedia was deleted, and here is the discussion page: fa:ویکی‌پدیا:نظرخواهی برای حذف/علی سلامی. He uses "Ismail" & "Ali" interchangeably as his first name and . . . one can guess he creates these pages on various language wikipedias. Salarabdolmohamadian ( talk) 17:25, 30 September 2017 (UTC) Copied from Talk:Ali Salami reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Mark the train Discuss 07:06, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Mark the train Discuss 07:06, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to 2016 Indian banknote demonetisation. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

ArthaKranti

ArthaKranti (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Probably non-notable. At most worth a mention and a redirect, but not an article. No real notability, and the contributor has reverted every attempt to redirect. DGG ( talk ) 06:03, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Mark the train Discuss 07:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Mark the train Discuss 07:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Mark the train Discuss 07:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete and redirect as par Vanamonde. The think tank's notability seems to rest entirely on its proposal concerning bank notes. If it becomes notable for other reasons, a new article could be written. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 10:34, 3 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Viventura

Viventura (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional and non-notable. The references are either about the general concept of nature tourism (like Der Spiegel , or just PR DGG ( talk ) 05:55, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mark the train Discuss 06:52, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of South America-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 16:23, 7 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 07:18, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

David Rolsky

David Rolsky (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article tagged with multiple issues for 5 years. No real RS and no convincing claim to notability. Probably time for the community to have a look. Agricola44 ( talk) 05:53, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Mark the train Discuss 06:48, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Mark the train Discuss 06:48, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Kimberly Gittings

Kimberly Gittings (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Gittings was Miss Georgia USA. This alone is not enough to make one notable, and no sources suggest anything else that shows notability. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 05:06, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 05:15, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 05:15, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 08:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 07:17, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Sandra Kegerreis

Sandra Kegerreis (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet any of the criteria for WP:Author. Also does not meet any criteria for WP:BIO Rogermx ( talk) 04:18, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 05:16, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 05:16, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:55, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 07:16, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

ABC (2018 film)

ABC (2018 film) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See film notability guidelines, which state that a film that is in principal photography is only notable if it has received notable coverage of the production.

This article has no references and so makes no claim for film notability or general notability.

Article has promotional tone. This could be dealt with, but might leave nothing. Robert McClenon ( talk) 03:51, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. All the information in this article appears to be derived from a brief, promotional entertainment article only published in the last 24 hours, from my research. The film's release information seems tentative, and a great amount of relevant details common to articles on Wikipedia about films, even ones in pre-production, are lacking. In addition, the total lack of references and promotional nature clinch it. Scriblerian1 ( talk) 05:53, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 05:18, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 05:18, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Snow/Speedy keep. no plausible reason for deletion DGG ( talk ) 18:59, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Prostitution in Tunisia

Prostitution in Tunisia (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not worth its own article.  —  Mr. Guye ( talk) ( contribs)  03:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions.  —  Mr. Guye ( talk) ( contribs)  03:49, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions.  —  Mr. Guye ( talk) ( contribs)  03:49, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  —  Mr. Guye ( talk) ( contribs)  03:50, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  —  Mr. Guye ( talk) ( contribs)  03:51, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions.  —  Mr. Guye ( talk) ( contribs)  03:52, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Petrifaction (disambiguation). czar 07:15, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Petrified (disambiguation)

Petrified (disambiguation) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This disambiguation is so small that it can easily be accomplished by a hatnote instead, though I doubt it needs even that. The only other actual article besides the main one is Petrifaction in mythology and fiction. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 13:36, 22 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 00:24, 23 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:13, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Promotional concerns can be dealt with through editing. ansh 666 05:34, 9 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Daryl Ng

Daryl Ng (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional content regarding person. Barely GNG. The coverage by SCMP in the citation was just about he made a decision for the company to employ Arup to make some design and research, which barely made him pass GNG due to the coverage of the works of Sino Land. Matthew_hk t c 18:59, 8 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:16, 8 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:16, 8 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:17, 8 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:18, 8 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 04:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Comment SCMP, the newspaper, according to its website [43], was closely connected with Daryl Ng's father/family's Sino Group for Sino Junior Reporter Programme. All other citation were either routine coverage of his position on public organization, and/or primary source and/or Sino Group, not any of them a notable coverage of Daryl Ng himself. Being son of a billionaire and on a position of a listed company, is not qualified to notability himself. Matthew_hk t c 03:25, 18 September 2017 (UTC) reply
The SCMP citation was removed by the possibly paid editor in this edit, so the current version. None of the non-primary source (and source the not connect with Sino Group in business/sponsorship, such as OUHK and SCMP) was actually about Daryl Ng. Matthew_hk t c 03:38, 18 September 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Leaning keep I do see a lot of coverage (both trivial and not-so-trivial) in Chinese, ranging from his civil/social activities to his support for/ties with Carrie Lam to his real estate development plans. There appears to be even paparazzi reports on who he's with during social gatherings. I think the coverage satisfies WP:GNG even though I agree that his notability derives mainly from his super-rich father and not at all from his individual accomplishments. Timmyshin ( talk) 06:46, 21 September 2017 (UTC) reply
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The coverage just a trivial level news coverage, just he bought some property again, or political linking of lunch/dinner meeting with chief executive candidate, without significant coverage that wrote in WP:GNG: "Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail. Matthew_hk t c 11:13, 21 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 07:29, 22 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Those coverage, was still circulate on the same tone as similar to current wikipedia article, his education, and then because of his interests in environment and his position in the company, listing out the works of the company and then claiming it is under his leadership; the in-depth coverage was on the projects but not on himself. Not sure other wikipedian would agree they were in-depth coverage on the person. Matthew_hk t c 08:54, 22 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:12, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 05:34, 9 October 2017 (UTC) reply

DreamFunded

DreamFunded (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is just an ad for an organization. Runs afoul of WP:PROMO, WP:COI and WP:TOOMANYREFS. Brian-armstrong ( talk) 04:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Brian-armstrong ( talk) 04:34, 22 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Brian-armstrong ( talk) 04:34, 22 September 2017 (UTC) reply

I am also nominating the following related page because it appears to have been edited by the same COI entity and is related to this organization.

Manny_Fernandez_(angel_investor) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete both -- entirely promotional with WP:SPIP sourcing. Promo content includes: "Fernandez has also often appeared as a keynote speaker!" Etc. Wikipedia is not a free means of promotion or is here to help subjects book speaking gigs. K.e.coffman ( talk) 01:52, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete both fail the GNG. I again wish to disagree with others, that usually the state of the article has little bearing on deletion. Notability of the subject does. z' L3X1 (distænt write) 02:36, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Per nominator. MassiveYR ♠ 14:32, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Seems to fail general notability as well as WP:PROMO and WP:GNG per above. I agree with WP:SPIP sourcing as consideration for delete, if only because heavy reliance on promotional sources suggests lack of notability verifiable in independent sources. I also agree with delete on the affiliated Manny Ramirez page for the same reason. Shelbystripes ( talk) 15:56, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Keep - meets notability. Featured in numerous independent, reliable sources: "Forbes, Inc. Magazine, CNBC, Squawk Box, TechCrunch, Fortune, Entrepreneur Magazine, Fast Company, Fox News, Wall Street Journal, ABC and others.” Fernandez has numerous television appearances on major US network TV shows. Is he being subjected to greater scrutiny because he is Latino? 23.82.234.36 ( talk) 18:09, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Just to use one of your examples, the Forbes articles cited are not about either subject. The cited articles just briefly mention Dreamfunded. That is not sufficient to meet notability requirements, as the citation would require substantive coverage about the subject. Brian-armstrong ( talk) 19:36, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply
These entire articles are about Fernandez and DreamFunded: (among others)
https://www.forbes.com/sites/giovannirodriguez/2016/07/17/a-latino-angel-wants-to-help-you-invest-in-tech-startups/#6909a09955e5
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/06/28/our-american-dream-start-up-guru-manny-fernandez-connects-people-to-money.html
These national TV shows feature him prominently:
https://www.cnbc.com/video/2016/02/12/providing-reasonable-prices-for-investors-dreamfunded-ceo.html
https://www.cnbc.com/make-me-a-millionaire-inventor/
He is also featured prominently in several Crowdfund Insider articles. This is an important industry publication.
And, what about the awards and recognitions he has received? These look like important awards.
Do we consider someone who has achieved significant notability within an industry? Looks like he is very well known as an expert in crowdfunding and angel investing. 23.82.234.36 ( talk) 21:09, 3 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The problem I see with these articles is that they are almost purely promotional. Wikipedia is meant to be an encyclopedia, not a means of advertising. If there are substantial, notable events regarding these subjects, they don't seem to be part of these articles. In fact, if you removed all of the promotional content from these articles you'd be left with just a few sentences. That isn't sufficient to justify having articles about these subjects.
By the way, can you specify what your relation is to these subjects, either personal or financial, if any? Brian-armstrong ( talk) 03:02, 6 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 07:13, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Xuyen Pham

Xuyen Pham (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO and the informal Poker project notability criteria. Clarityfiend ( talk) 01:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 05:14, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Delete, WP:GNG and WP:BIO are definitely not met, and it doesn't seem like the Gaming Club tournament that she won satisfies the requirements set by WikiProject Poker. Next year, maybe? dragfyre_ ʞןɐʇ c 17:50, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 07:11, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Nightset

AfDs for this article:
Nightset (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially toned page for an unremarkable private company; significant RS coverage not found. Raised $600K in funding, which strongly suggests that it's WP:TOOSOON for an encyclopedia article. Created by an account currently indef blocked for abusing multiple accounts; pls see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Professor of Art.

Additionally, I'm nominating the article on the CEO of the company. The concerns expressed above, including being created by the same blocked account, apply to this article equally:

Might as well raze the walled garden to the ground. K.e.coffman ( talk) 00:53, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 00:54, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. I think we can safely SNOW close this as a G3 given that everyone agrees it's an obvious hoax ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 10:04, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Rothmanhaus

Rothmanhaus (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Found this article while searching through orphans. Most likely a hoax, sources are virtually nonexistent and everything else refers back to Wikipedia. It seems to have escaped attention outside of a few tagging edits. Dellavien ( talk) 00:51, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 05:12, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:48, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 01:23, 9 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Wang Chongwei

AfDs for this article:
Wang Chongwei (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN hockey player, fails NHOCKEY as never having played in a league or at a level recognized by the guideline as notable. No evidence the subject meets the GNG. Ravenswing 00:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 05:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 05:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2017_October_1&oldid=1142617669"

Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE