The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep Use of the find sources links shows enough material to suggest the individual is notable. Suggest per
WP:BLP any contentious material that cannot be cited to a reliable source is simply removed. Apologies to the nominator but the deletion review seems a knee jerk reaction to a legal threat.WCMemail 22:30, 6 April 2015 (UTC)reply
User: Wee Curry Monster Please retract your personal attack, making assumptions about my motive is neither productive nor necessary.
CombatWombat42 (
talk) 22:49, 6 April 2015 (UTC)reply
It wasn't a personal attack, please don't assume it was. I presumed your motivation was to protect wikipedia. Regards, WCMemail 23:32, 6 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep - clearly notable:
WP:NPOL presumes notability for persons who serve in a national government, and indeed there appears to be coverage in multiple reliable sources, for example
[1],
[2],
[3],
[4]. Granted the article could use expansion and more inline citations but those are not criteria for deletion.
Ivanvector (
talk) 22:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep per above. National politician, coverage by multiple sources.
32.216.140.250 (
talk) 00:37, 7 April 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.