The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete: Most of this chart is unsourced, rest is only passing mentions elsewhere. I'd !keep if we had sourcing for the majority of it; as it is, we have 5 references for a list that is easily double or triple that number. Could very well be hokum, with no sourcing, we can't prove or disprove anything.
Oaktree b (
talk)
15:50, 11 October 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.