The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:20, 8 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom/previous discussion. --Non-Dropframetalk 14:29, 30 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment - could a wandering admin confirm whether or not this meets CSD G4?
shoy (
reactions) 14:39, 30 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Shoy I can't imagine as G4 requires the article be "a sufficiently identical and unimproved copy." Although it's a similar article, I don't think it really falls into the purpose of the G4 category. --Non-Dropframetalk 14:46, 30 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Shoy point taken. If nothing else, those discussions create precedent for deletion here. Frankly, it's looking a bit snowy to me. --Non-Dropframetalk 16:34, 30 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. More than adequately explained in the AfD discussion for similar articles.
Doctorhawkes (
talk) 10:58, 7 October 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.