The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. I created the article not because of
WP:POVFORK but because of the substantial number of nicknames in use. Claiming
WP:UNDUE is in itself a judgement, if there are an equal number of nicknames that are non-perjorative, they belong here too, however I am unable to find them. (much praise for the President does not use nicknames, but generic e.g. "Best President ever". While I see some point for the argument of
WP:RECENT, that is more a function of Trump having recently become President.
Keizers (
talk) 22:33, 20 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete - I can't find any reliable sources that discuss such a list, which would be needed to pass
WP:LISTN. A few of the more notable nicknames could be added to the biography
Donald Trump.-
MrX 02:21, 21 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. MrX, the list doesn't have to be sourced, but the nicknames do as nicknames. I don't know that this has happened (but
nice try), and at any rate the topic is really ridiculous and not notable. So no, delete. Yes, NPOV may apply as well since this is a BLP and the list is almost 100% negative.
Drmies (
talk) 02:28, 21 August 2017 (UTC)reply
The specific list doesn't need to be sourced, but notability of lists is based on the group. List articles are sometimes made by listing notable subjects that already have Wikipedia articles. Simply compiling a list of sourced items does not satisfy notability.-
MrX 02:51, 21 August 2017 (UTC)reply
That is what I was saying.
Drmies (
talk) 03:33, 21 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete This is not encyclopedic content.
AusLondonder (
talk) 03:35, 21 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. Looks
POVFORKish. It’s highly negative, and likely to get worse. In the end, it will look like a polemic. Nip it in the budding stage.
Objective3000 (
talk) 10:37, 21 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment - This should really be SNOW closed as delete, other than the nom, the !vote is unanimously delete.
Jdcomix (
talk) 10:58, 21 August 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.