The result was delete. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 03:21, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply
This list is cruft and completely unnecessary. In fact, it can never hope to be comprehensive, considering how broad the scope of the article is. It needs to go. Feed back ☎ 08:31, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
So if that issue is fixed, then the only remaining question for me is whether performing on the independent circuit is significant enough of a fact in a wrestler's career for us to index notable wrestlers by that fact (per WP:LISTPURP, WP:CLN), which I don't know the answer to.
The nom nor the one delete !vote above do not address that question, nor even offer any argument I find substantive on any relevant point as to whether this list has merit (insisting, without elaboration, that something is "cruft" or "unnecessary" doesn't accomplish anything, and a list does not have to be comprehensive, particularly when it only indexes articles that are members of a larger group of which not every member is notable). postdlf ( talk) 16:38, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply