From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:57, 9 September 2020 (UTC) reply

List of governments supporting trap–neuter–return

List of governments supporting trap–neuter–return (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books ¡ news ¡ scholar ¡ free images ¡ WP refs) ¡ FENS ¡ JSTOR ¡ TWL)

Non-notable topic that is WP:LISTCRUFT. Fails WP:GNG. There are no citations in the article discussing "governments supporting trap–neuter–return"; the topic is part of WP:WWIN, specifically a WP:DIRECTORY. Normal Op ( talk) 23:37, 1 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Normal Op ( talk) 23:37, 1 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Normal Op ( talk) 23:37, 1 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Delete per nom. The list is unclear- what governments and where? Just from a USA persepctive, "government" could mean a town, parish (or county, for everyone else), city, state, federal, etc. Expand that to cover the entire globe- Wikipedia being an online, international encyclopedia and all- and the list has the potential to grow to beyond what is manageable or useful.-- SilverTiger12 ( talk) 14:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.