From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:12, 5 February 2017 (UTC) reply

List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in South Ossetia (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Empty list Rathfelder ( talk) 22:26, 28 January 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Delete - It's an empty list because the referenced database does not have any listings for this "country". No references tie stratigraphy and this geographic entity together. Glendoremus ( talk) 07:10, 29 January 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Keep I did some researches. There's lots of references from reliable sources but the article needs lots of changes and work. Its not a separated country, just little region as a part of Russia. Weak keep if proper sources and links will be added. There's more than enough of them in simple google search — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucasserrano ( talkcontribs)
  • Delete - It seems pointless to have an empty list. If reliably sourced information becomes available in the future, the list can be re-created. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 11:30, 31 January 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. I agree that it is pointless to have an empty list in article space. Anyone that wants to work on this can move it or copy it to Draft:List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in South Ossetia until some actual content is added. Gnome de plume ( talk) 14:54, 31 January 2017 (UTC) reply
  • The whole set of "stratigraphic units" list per country sounds questionable to me. I realize there might be too many of them to merge all in Lists_of_fossiliferous_stratigraphic_units_in_Europe, but it is fairly obvious that there will be some imbalance of length between e.g. List_of_fossiliferous_stratigraphic_units_in_Italy and List_of_fossiliferous_stratigraphic_units_in_Luxembourg. Couldn't them be sorted by more general geographic areas rather than country (which would also avoid questions such as whether South Ossetia is a country)? (I realize that creating those articles was more productive that my whining here, but hey, it's true.) Tigraan Click here to contact me 11:51, 3 February 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep  Can't know that the list is empty if it is deleted.  Deletion also prevents additions.  Unscintillating ( talk) 05:06, 4 February 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Lists nothing. Andrew. Z. Colvin • Talk 05:28, 4 February 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.