The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Armbrust Talk to me about my edits review 17:12, 9 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Yeah, I’m aware that the last deletion (three years ago) closed as snow keep. However, Wikipedia’s policies have changed in the intervening three years. The article clearly violates WP:INDISCRIMINATE; it is a purely subjective and not-exhaustive list (it doesn’t even contain all the films in some of its major sources). Most other similar superlative lists (best, greatest, worst) have been deleted; see no reason why this shouldn’t either. A previous argument made in the last deletion discussion was it should be kept because every film on this list has been deemed the worst by a critic; I refute that by saying that a) the listen doesn’t even contain all the films all the critics mention consider to be bad, and b) it’s subjective already in what critics you choose to listen to (probably just as subjective as what films you pick in the first place). This article is a time sink; a set of special rules had to be instituted just for this article to keep people from adding whatever they please. A further concern is that the article isn’t globalized. Though I concede that this article probably passes notability, I feel that that is more than outweighed by it being a violation what Wikipedia is not. Purpleback pack 89≈≈≈≈ 14:51, 5 November 2011 (UTC) reply