- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 10:24, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- List of fictional villainous teams and groups ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia is not TVTropes, this is more of the kind of thing that would go there. Entirely unreferenced WP:LISTCRUFT that is not maintainable. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 07:42, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. This list is arbitrary, poorly defined, and unmaintainable. It's extremely poorly sourced WP:LISTCRUFT. Reyk YO! 08:03, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 08:12, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 08:12, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Obvious WP:LISTCRUFT. Ajf773 ( talk) 09:23, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - for all the reasons previously stated. Argento Surfer ( talk) 13:40, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Clearly listcruft, unmaintainable, with no rules. For instance, what makes Team Rocket an anime team, and not say a Video game team? Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 10:13, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. This is a WP:SNOW situation: this is WP:OR and WP:SYNTH, trivial and not encyclopedic. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 16:24, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- SNOW delete - This would easily pass a PROD for being unreferenced, original research listcruft. This is Wikipedia, not TVtropes. Nanophosis ( talk) 21:48, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- Prepare for trouble, and make it double. I mean delete per all above. This is the kind of thing that goes to TV Tropes and not here. Even if it was suitable for Wikipedia, the inclusion standards and sourcing would be difficult to make use of. Better to just get rid of it than wasting everyone's time. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 23:00, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.