The result was delete all. Sr 13 08:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC) reply
Considering this is the fourth AFD nom, I'm going to summarize the points which have been mentioned previously:
In summary, and my own opinion on this matter, Delete all because after several months of various edits this article still has none of the required citations or references, the primary rationale for deletion has never been rebutted or addressed in the slightest, and (due to lack of editor involvement) probably never will. Arguments in favor of keeping don't hold water while arguments for deletion are solid, and with previous AFD's concluded as "keep" or "no consensus", it leaves me wondering if the closing admin called the result via counting hands instead of weighing arguments; after all, Wikipedia is not a democracy and neither is AFD. -- Stratadrake 02:36, 3 July 2007 (UTC) reply