Wikipedia:articles For Deletion List Of Cultural References In The Picture Of Dorian Gray

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 16:23, 19 January 2018 (UTC) reply

List of cultural references in The Picture of Dorian Gray

(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article that has been around since at least 2006 when split from the main article was prodded with the rationale: "Completely unsourced trivia". It is partially internally sourced. I'm not taking a strong stand on whether it should stay but be cleaned up or deleted entirely, but I think it needs discussion. Ladyof Shalott 21:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Ladyof Shalott 21:43, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Delete as prodder, everything here is unsourced and useless trivia. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(
What did I screw up now?)} 01:54, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Delete as unnotable trivia. Somebody had way, way, way too much time on their hands and mostly decided to categorize every(?) character in the book as real or made up. This is about as useful for analysis as listing which pages start with "A" or "The". Clarityfiend ( talk) 03:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. ^{Baby
miss
fortune} 05:15, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Delete- excessive listcruft and original research. Reyk _YO! 14:49, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Delete - fun fact, the same editor who added all this information in 2005, had at one point created separate articles for each chapter of the book. It looks like once they realized their attempts to turn Wikipedia into CliffsNotes wasn't going to be welcome, they stopped editing the encyclopedia. — Warren. ‘ talk , 16:24, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply
- Yah, I reckon 2005 was kind of the tail end of Wikipedia's early years, when its purpose and scope was still not quite set in stone. Maybe back then a huge CliffsNotes analogue was still possible. But I'm glad we didn't go that way. Reyk _YO! 17:57, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Delete Listcruft. I'm sure that a similar list could be compiled for many novels; what is so special about Dorian Gray? TheLongTone ( talk) 15:09, 15 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.