- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. WP:SNOW keep, per WP:DINC. Article has been cleaned up. (non-admin closure) ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 05:39, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- List of Taskmaster episodes ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Too much unsourced WP:OR. Matt14451 ( talk) 10:56, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:16, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:17, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:17, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:EPISODE. Containing too much original research is not a reason to delete - deletion is not cleanup.-- Laun chba ller 19:28, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per above. If it's unsourced, tag it or add sources. -- Alex TW 02:34, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per above. ISD ( talk) 07:45, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per all the above, and no valid deletion rationale has been supplied. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 08:17, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep but everything other than the ratings section needs to go. Something like List of 8 Out of 10 Cats episodes is a relevant model to use, though this one's an odd one as the contestants are the same throughout the series. The task-by-task cruft is not for Wikipedia but it is valuable to fans so maybe someone could ship it off to Wikia. Also, none of the content is original research. It is, however, a massive violation of WP:IINFO/ WP:NOTSTATS. — Bilorv (c) (talk) 19:08, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.