The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
Eluchil404 (
talk •
contribs) 02:04, 8 Jul 2006 (UTC)
Delete. I believe that this "list" article merits deletion due to Wikipedia's policy that it is not an indiscriminate collection of information; specifically, that it is not for "lists or repositories of loosely associated topics." The policy seems to indicate that if the list itself (not the entries comprising the list, but the actual list itself) is famous on its own standing, or contributed to the fame of the subject, it is acceptable to keep; I do not believe this list satisfies that corollary. —
Mike (
talk •
contribs)
17:11, 2 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Strong keep per A Man in Black. Mike, I agree with many of your Star Wars AfDs, but I feel that this is going too far. Star Wars video games are notable; therefore, the list topic is notable, and since all the topics associate with the title, it's not as non-notable as "minor star wars companies" or "minor star wars organizations", which I agree with deleting. — Deckiller18:50, 2 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Comment The policy you are referring to is meant for articles that have merely links to outside sites or other articles in a "see also" fashion. This article organizes information and provides text outside of links. Therefore, it does not violate that policy. — Deckiller00:20, 3 July 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.