The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep as a merge target for all the characters, per the slowly growing consensus that this is the best way to deal with fictional characters who do not have independent notability outside of being part of the ensemble. —
Quasirandom (
talk)
14:33, 10 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Comment - If this article is not deleted, another editor is going to remove the character section of the main
Rugrats article. Without it, that article is going to look terrible! Because basically, it will have very little notable content left. Thanks TheProf | Talk14:38, 10 March 2008 (UTC)reply
You can, if you want to, withdraw this AfD nomination, and start reworking the character section in the main article right now. I certainly wouldn't be opposed to this. –
sgeurekat•
c18:49, 10 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Comment I just EC'd with someone, and that answered my question of whether or not this falls under the arbcom injunction about TV episodes and characters, so the discussion should probably be tagged (I don't know the template for it), even though it looks like it may start
snowing soon. However, I don't think that the injunction is really supposed to be used as an argument for keeping, as otherwise there'd be an injunction against bringing the articles to AfD altogether.
LaMenta3 (
talk)
19:08, 10 March 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.