The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Pure listcruft and trivia, he has appeared on the news media many times, no forseeable use. - CHAMPION(
talk) (
contributions) (
logs) 02:12, 3 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete If complete, this list would never end. Serves no educational purpose.
Ramaksoud2000(Talk to me) 03:59, 3 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Ramaksoud2000: If it is complete, the list will end, if it will never end, it will never be complete, your sentence contradicts itself. - CHAMPION(
talk) (
contributions) (
logs) 06:40, 3 January 2017 (UTC)reply
I meant that if an attempt at completion was made, the list would never end.
Ramaksoud2000(Talk to me) 08:07, 3 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. Utterly worthless, like the man himself.
Clarityfiend (
talk) 05:42, 3 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete - This list, to be comprehensive, would have to be updated every single time Trump appears on TV - that's clearly a ridiculous thing to do - Wikipedia is not a News site, it's meant to be an encyclopaedia. A running tally of TV appearances is not appropriate here.
Exemplo347 (
talk) 13:04, 3 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete as an indiscriminate collection of information par excellence.
TimothyJosephWood 13:35, 3 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom
Spiderone 16:56, 3 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. As amused I am by the hatnote labelling The Apprentice as a sitcom, there is no conceivable reason why we would need to maintain a list to exhaustively and indiscriminately document every single time the POTUS-elect ever happened to appear on TV, reaching back to five or six (or more) years before he was even POTUS-elect. In theory, such a list could be compiled for absolutely every single person who has existed at all since the dawn of television broadcasting — but what's it's lacking is any real point.
Bearcat (
talk) 17:50, 3 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.