- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:10, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- List of Digimon Data Squad characters ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is made up of only plot summaries. I don't see any real world information that sufficiently establishes notability. Fangusu ( talk) 18:55, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose: No actual reason presented why it has to be deleted aside of bias. It's not made up of plot summaries but summarizes the appearances of the neo-mythological figures presented in the series. (Most are missing some more info on them though.) If anything add a {{Refimprove}} note on top of the article... -- Fixuture ( talk) 20:13, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep No real reason presented for deletion or effort to fix the article issues, and nominator has an SPI against them currently. Nate • ( chatter) 21:19, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete We already have the major characters summarized at
Digimon Data Squad#Characters in addition to an oversized plot. Why do we need this list that the main article already summarizes? -
Knowledgekid87 (
talk)
21:35, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Feel free to nominate this again if closed due to the nom's SPI; my rationale is based on a string of WP:BADFAITH nominations for Digimon articles rather than one well-researched and presenting possible solutions. Nate • ( chatter) 00:59, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Research takes time though, years for some articles. If this is not deleted due to the SPI and WP:BADFAITH issues then I wont re-nominate this again for at least a week or so. I want to see someone who knows the series (because I don't) actually improve this list. Im not trying to sound harsh, I would love it if this article was improved. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 01:57, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the
list of Lists-related deletion discussions. —
JJMC89 (
T·
E·
C)
01:39, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Mrschimpf: Please stop talking about my Sockpuppet Investigation. I am sorry about that misconduct. I don't think it is relevant to this AfD and, for another thing, I am not an evil person.
Fangusu (
talk)
02:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I said absolutely nothing about you being evil. However, having a history of socking and nominating a series of articles dealing with the same topic is not suggesting good faith to me, and if you bring a page to AfD you must exhaust all avenues of research on its notability, which I don't see within these nominations. Nate • ( chatter) 04:53, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Mrschimpf: Please stop talking about my Sockpuppet Investigation. I am sorry about that misconduct. I don't think it is relevant to this AfD and, for another thing, I am not an evil person.
Fangusu (
talk)
02:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the
list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -
Knowledgekid87 (
talk)
13:19, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Merge then: that whole section should be merged into List of Digimon Data Squad characters with the Digimon Data Squad#Characters-section being comprised of just the main characters and a link to the list via {{Main|...}}. -- Fixuture ( talk) 18:53, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Article is dreadfully underdeveloped and after a series of cuts by an admin, it would be better not to exist. —Kirt Message 06:21, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per Knowledgekid87's reasoning. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 12:39, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete This is merely a list of names with no information offered. How do we even know which are the main characters in an article with no character information?
Dimadick (
talk)
22:00, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
- Well that's why it needs to be improved, not removed. Also edits such as
this one here aren't helping with getting it to a state of being actually valuable and more than just a "list of names with no information offered". --
Fixuture (
talk)
21:57, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- There is nothing stopping anyone from re-creating this list in the future, we already have the information duplicated elsewhere though. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 17:14, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- Well that's why it needs to be improved, not removed. Also edits such as
this one here aren't helping with getting it to a state of being actually valuable and more than just a "list of names with no information offered". --
Fixuture (
talk)
21:57, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:37, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:37, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.