The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete Or rather, some kind of soft merge? The article is the same except for a different coat of paint. To @
Akhiljaxxn, looking at the edit history of the article you authored, it seems you have been taking a lot of inspiration from the duplicate article. While this is fine, it does seem rude to other editors. To
SHISHIR DUA, it seems you were aware of the article's existence, as you had edited it in April of 2019. If you felt the article was not sufficient, why not improve it instead of making a new one? And to you both, I would suggest you shake handsbump elbows and both contribute to one article. Preferably
List of ATK playersThepenguin9 (talk)09:46, 27 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge/histmerge. It's difficult to tell from the histories what came first and where it came. There have been a significant number of copy/pastes, redirects and undoings. We don't need two lists for the same thing, and
List of ATK players would seem to be the correct name. But wherever it ends up, please will the closing admin make sure that, for correct attribution, all the relevant history gets attached to whichever page remains.
Redirect to
List of ATK players. I have added {{copied}} to both pages to make sure that proper attribution is given. The page should not be deleted as long as
List of ATK players exist, because the page's history serves as attribution for the copied content. Histmerge may be possible, though would be quite complicated in this circumstance I'm afraid, because editing has continued on both pages. --
MrClog (
talk)
12:52, 28 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete:List of ATK players This was created in 2018, and
List of ATK (football club) players this one in 2020. So, there's no point in keeping the later one. If someone copy-pastes from one to another then its a different editor-editor issue. The name ATK is more suitable. Also, the overseas article should be merged with this one. Thus, I vote for delete or just redirect to previous one. ❯❯❯ S A H A13:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Deleting the page is indeed not an option, as it would create a copyright (attribution) problem. Redirect seems best to me, because List of ATK players is a more suitable title, and that way we can keep the attribution. --
MrClog (
talk)
16:22, 28 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.