- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 23:37, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Linda Lusk ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NPOL as mayor of Prosser, WA (Population: 5,714). All non-local coverage Lusk has received is in relation to as sex scandal involving her and a minor so it looks like a case of WP:BLP1E. GPL93 ( talk) 20:39, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. GPL93 ( talk) 20:39, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. GPL93 ( talk) 20:39, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
-
Comment: @
GPL93: I haven't read through it right now, but I don't think a mayor is a low-profile individual and as such
WP:BIO1E, not
WP:BLP1E would apply. --
MrClog (
talk)
15:25, 19 July 2019 (UTC) - Delete. Prosser WA is nowhere near large enough to hand its mayors an automatic presumption of notability just for existing as mayors, but the coverage shown is not enough to make her special just because she got a small blip of 1E coverage in the context of a single event — and quibbling over whether this is a BIO1E or a BLP1E doesn't make a big difference here, because it's still a 1E bio either way. WP:GNG does not just count the number of media hits a person can show and keep anyone who hits two; it still tests for context, and what's described here is not a context that passes the ten-year test for importance. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a "name and shame all sex offenders" database. Bearcat ( talk) 13:40, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MrClog ( talk) 13:52, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NPOL and does not pass WP:GNG. -- Enos733 ( talk) 01:07, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NPOL and is a negative BLP. SportingFlyer T· C 07:11, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Fail passes WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. -- SalmanZ ( talk) 21:16, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per above. -- MrClog ( talk) 21:31, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.