From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Davewild ( talk) 18:18, 24 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Linda Jefferson (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable women's (gridiron) football player, fails WP:GNG and WP:NGRIDIRON. Joseph2302 ( talk) 16:20, 3 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:33, 4 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:33, 4 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:33, 4 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 11:11, 10 June 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Wikimandia, the problem with relying on ANYBIO is that there is very little evidence that the awards the subject received are themselves notable per WP:GNG, or significant or well-knonw. Remember an award sponsored by a magazine, for which the only significant coverage appears in that magazine, is not independent of the subject, and therefore not an acceptable basis for determining notability per GNG. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 14:39, 10 June 2015 (UTC) reply
By honors I meant the Hall of Fame inductions rather than the awards. Мандичка YO 😜 14:56, 10 June 2015 (UTC) reply
I don't see being inducted into the Semi-Pro Football Hall of Fame as a notable enough achievement. Joseph2302 ( talk) 15:05, 10 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 10:44, 17 June 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.