The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. Borough councillors are not handed an automatic free pass over
WP:NPOL #2 just for existing (no, not even in cities like London where the main citywide councillors do get that). She could still qualify for an article if she could be
reliably sourced as the subject of enough media coverage to make her a special case, but that's not what the sources here are showing — there are
primary sources (the borough council's own website, her own LinkedIn, a corporate licensing directory), there are local blogs and local community weeklies, and there was an invalid
WP:CIRCULAR reference to another Wikipedia article, but there is no evidence being shown of even one source that would even start her down the path of passing
WP:GNG.
Bearcat (
talk)
15:52, 24 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete Peck is frequently mentioned, but I can't find anything that constitutes substantial coverage. There's a lot of mention of her in reliable sources, and I'd be open to changing my !vote if evidence of substantial coverage were to come to light.
Ralbegen (
talk)
11:54, 25 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep Leader of a London Council who was involved in a long running and controversial planning proposal (The
Garden Bridge) which recived national attention, have added links to reflect that
Sam11333 (
talk)
23:03, 26 June 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.