The result was no consensus. I think MelanieN has it right that a redirect/merge is appropriate, however there is no consensus to keep, delete or merge. v/r - T P 14:50, 7 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Non notable local councillor, who fails WP:POLITICIAN. Of the refs in the article, one is a blog and can be discounted, three are standard local press coverage of a debate between local council candidates, all of them mentioning her in passing, while the remaining ref is about a minor controversy she was involved in and seems a classic case of WP:BLP1E Valenciano ( talk) 21:05, 28 April 2012 (UTC) reply
Unscintillating ( talk) 02:01, 2 May 2012 (UTC) replyLack of multiple sources suggests that the topic may be more suitable for inclusion in an article on a broader topic. It is common for multiple newspapers or journals to publish the same story, sometimes with minor alterations or different headlines, but one story does not constitute multiple works. Several journals simultaneously publishing different articles does not always constitute multiple works, especially when the authors are relying on the same sources, and merely restating the same information. Similarly, a series of publications by the same author or in the same periodical is normally counted as one source.
Northamerica1000 (talk) 22:51, 3 May 2012 (UTC) reply"If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list."