From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 02:10, 6 April 2015 (UTC) reply

Les Jones (politician) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As far as I can see, does not meet WP:POLITICIAN: local politician, candidate for national office but not yet elected, only press coverage is in passing as a side-effect of covering a story on another politician The Anome ( talk) 20:07, 29 March 2015 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. Only a candidate, fails WP:POLITICIAN. Time enough to create this article if he does get electiod on the back of a liberal collapse in the constiuency. TheLongTone ( talk) 14:14, 30 March 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per many, many precedents. He's not so much a perennial candidate as a failed one. Bearian ( talk) 00:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:23, 1 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:23, 1 April 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Local politicians who ran for higher office are not default notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 14:41, 4 April 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.