The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete, non-notable position, non-notable person, the fact that he's notable in a town does not grant him worldwide notability.
Buggie111 (
talk) 23:50, 27 October 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep Change per Schwede and Dweller.
Buggie111 (
talk) 13:54, 29 October 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete - Appears to fall below the level required. -
SimonLyall (
talk) 01:18, 28 October 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep I can understand why everybody else (other than the article's creator) has voted delete so far, but this guy is so outspoken that he gets regular coverage in The Press, which is published in Christchurch and is not a Dunedin newspaper. The article at this point makes no attempt to demonstrate notability, though. I'll put some references on the article's talk page as a starting point for expansion. If the decision is to remove the article, I suggest that it be userfied. Schwede66 20:04, 28 October 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep as should easily meet notability with more detail, as per Schwede66.
NealeFamily (
talk) 03:47, 29 October 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep seems to pass
WP:GNG, which trumps POLITICIAN --
Dweller (
talk) 13:46, 29 October 2012 (UTC)reply
Updated article with references from National news agencies and more information.
NealeFamily (
talk) 01:54, 31 October 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.