The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I appear to have made a mistake in accepting this from draft 6 months ago. There's actually insufficient evidence of notability -- almost all of the positions listed are just student offices. Apparent self promotion, previously deleted from the pt WP. DGG (
talk )
00:52, 29 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. I saw this draft back in the spring, and rejected it the first time it was put in the AFC queue because at that time it was written in Portuguese rather than English, but I didn't keep it on my radar after the creator translated it. There's nothing here that's "inherently" notable per
WP:NPOL, but he doesn't get over
WP:GNG either — the article is not based on
reliable source coverage about him, but on a mix of
primary sources and glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of other people or things. And since this was its creator's only contribution to Wikipedia, it indeed looks like a self-promotional violation of our
conflict of interest rules.
Bearcat (
talk)
18:16, 1 January 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.