The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
JohnCD (
talk) 15:51, 15 January 2014 (UTC)reply
BLP for a local teacher/administrator with no significant references, no assertion of notability, and written by a
Conflict-of-Interest editor. My search found no independent reliable sources -- let alone significant coverage. The article fails
WP:BIO and
WP:GNG. Although a BLP, this is essentially written as a
WP:MEMORIAL. —
CactusWriter (talk) 18:08, 7 January 2014 (UTC) —
CactusWriter (talk) 18:08, 7 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. Nominator said it all.
Lagrange613 01:39, 11 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. Borderline A7 speedy deletion. As the nominator says, there is no assertion of notability in the article, despite a lot of fluff. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 16:46, 13 January 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.