The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Strong Keep: Notable for the fact that lead attorney was ranked #1 Trademark Attorney in U.S. by the Trademark Insider Report, which is the authority on the Trademark industry (link provided in entry, see page 8 of report for ranking). The Trademark Insider Report constitutes sufficient evidence of non-trivial coverage in an independent source. The fact that the law office has been in existence for 10 months is irrelevant, as there is a whole category devoted to "Law firms established in 2007". There are plenty of other law firm entries with substantially less content (see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwards_Angell_Palmer_%26_Dodge). -
Anon8003:05, 14 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
207.237.221.214 (
talk) reply
Delete the single claim to notability is simply a list; such a list amounts to a trivial coverage. No evidence of non-trivial coverage in independent sources per
WP:N and
WP:CORP, so should be deleted. --
Jayron32|
talk|
contribs05:40, 11 November 2007 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete as spam. It is possible that the person is notable, but that is not a given from this article. In any case, notability does not transfer from the individual to a company.
Vegaswikian06:51, 15 November 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.