Labingi
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Labingi ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG seems like an list disambiguation. Both articles link to each other in the lead. Could possible be redirected to Westron language? Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 02:17, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Fictional elements, and Science fiction and fantasy. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 02:17, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Appears to be real, but so trivial as to not merit a mention in Bilbo's article as it stands now. Is there more context to these supposed names that would fill out a stub, or another article that explains the context here? Jclemens ( talk) 04:54, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Disambiguations. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 04:58, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, certainly real and readily sourced, and a reminder that we should certainly make more of Westron names, in fact the whole language, throughout the WikiProject. The prime concern across the project has been notability, given that there was a large legacy of what seemed to be fan-created articles with (at best) primary sourcing. Now that that's been fixed, looking at the development of names and of characters, all the legendarium side of things, is an obvious next step: i.e. we should add the "Labingi" element to many articles. I'd hope it'd go without saying that you can't decide notability by looking at Wikipedia's gaps, but perhaps that's worth repeating here. Tolkien devoted enormous effort to the names in multiple languages, complete with Pseudotranslation from Westron to English; scholars are starting to catch up with these legendarium (Silmarillion without italics) aspects, so there is potentially large scope for article improvement in this direction. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 12:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Question Judging from the description in
Template:Surname and many examples I see, it seems that
name pages do work differently with regard to notability requirements as compared to "normal" articles. They seem to be more or less a special type of disambiguation page. Is that correct?
Daranios (
talk)
15:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- That's right, they are basically navigation lists.
Chiswick Chap (
talk)
15:31, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- The thing is this is a fictional name with only two uses.
Questions?
four
Olifanofmrtennant (she/her)
23:54, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- When things need disambiguating, it doesn't matter if there are 2 or 20.
Chiswick Chap (
talk)
04:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Except in this instance disambiguation isn’t needed. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 23:19, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- When things need disambiguating, it doesn't matter if there are 2 or 20.
Chiswick Chap (
talk)
04:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- The thing is this is a fictional name with only two uses.
Questions?
four
Olifanofmrtennant (she/her)
23:54, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- That's right, they are basically navigation lists.
Chiswick Chap (
talk)
15:31, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep As a name page this does not need to fullfill WP:GNG as discussed above. I think a sentence adding the Westron version of the name to Bilbo Baggins in the way it does appear at Frodo Baggins#Concept and creation is warranted, and can be verfied by both primary and secondary sources. (I only now have seen that the name appears in the very beginning at Bilbo Baggins, so I am not sure if more is necessary for the name as such. Daranios ( talk) 15:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC)) Partially answering Jclemens' question, I did see small pieces of further context, which are probably best included in other articles: The Hobbit Encyclopedia, p. 201, states how we see that the connection between Baggins and Bag End is deliberate, because it also appears in the Westron names. Probably best suited for the Bag End article. This snippet view from Myth Print magazine has criticism on the introduction of the Westron names, referring to Maura Labingi, as they can detract from appreciating the names commonly appearing in the books, like Frodo Baggins. Probably best suited for the Pseudotranslation in The Lord of the Rings article. This article has a bit of commentary on how the names Baggins and Labingi, which both can be related to (to) bag/(to) pocket, are suitable for the character of Bilbo (and Frodo as his heir), i.e. suited for the Bilbo Baggins article. I don't quite get what kind of publication that is, though. Daranios ( talk) 10:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Both of the two things disambiguated are not common names for the characters by a longshot. Per WP:NAMELIST, articles on people should be listed at the disambiguation page for their given name or surname only if they are reasonably well known by it. I assume this also applies to fictional characters, making this DAB page blatantly violate policy. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 13:25, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hmm, I think
WP:NAMELIST refers to a very different case than ours here, with their example of
Lincoln (disambiguation): If there is a term with a number of different meanings, which includes both persons' names and other things, then one should only include very prominent examples (like
Abraham Lincoln) in the main disambiguation page, while other persons' names should be spun out into a page like
Lincoln (name). Here, we only have names of (fictional) persons. Secondly, the guideline says why it exists in the first place: To prevent disambiguation pages from getting too long. That is very much not a problem here.
Daranios (
talk)
15:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Well, the article is presented as a name list, and uses the templates that are intended for real life people. So I have no choice but to judge it as one - if I don't, it has even less of a claim for existence due to violating
WP:PTM.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
06:20, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I see this also as a name list.
WP:NAMELIST, despite its title, does not deal with how to construct name lists, but how to deal with regular disambiguation pages which also contain names, and the relationship between regular disambiguation pages and name lists. The part you have quoted therefore does not apply to our name list here, as is directly present in that part:
...should be listed at the disambiguation page...
. So no violation of that guideline here. Daranios ( talk) 09:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I see this also as a name list.
WP:NAMELIST, despite its title, does not deal with how to construct name lists, but how to deal with regular disambiguation pages which also contain names, and the relationship between regular disambiguation pages and name lists. The part you have quoted therefore does not apply to our name list here, as is directly present in that part:
- Well, the article is presented as a name list, and uses the templates that are intended for real life people. So I have no choice but to judge it as one - if I don't, it has even less of a claim for existence due to violating
WP:PTM.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
06:20, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hmm, I think
WP:NAMELIST refers to a very different case than ours here, with their example of
Lincoln (disambiguation): If there is a term with a number of different meanings, which includes both persons' names and other things, then one should only include very prominent examples (like
Abraham Lincoln) in the main disambiguation page, while other persons' names should be spun out into a page like
Lincoln (name). Here, we only have names of (fictional) persons. Secondly, the guideline says why it exists in the first place: To prevent disambiguation pages from getting too long. That is very much not a problem here.
Daranios (
talk)
15:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:48, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 15:55, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete They are literally father and son. They are the only two people listed. We don't need a surname list when everyone on the list is related. We do not have Obama (name) or Biden (name) for the same reason. QuicoleJR ( talk) 23:43, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- @
QuicoleJR:
We don't need a surname list when everyone on the list is related.
Why not? Is that fixed as a consensus somewhere? Obama and Biden redirect to Barack Obama and Joe Biden respectively, because one bearer of the name is clearly much more well known than the others ( WP:PRIMARYTARGET). Which is not the case for our two characters here. But we do have Obama (surname) and Biden (surname), which are slightly different cases, but certainly do not lend support for deletion here. Daranios ( talk) 10:43, 5 July 2024 (UTC)- Ok, did not know those existed, but they have unrelated people so my point still stands. Surname lists are typically used for navigational purposes, but when the only two notable people with the surname are father and son, the articles link to each other anyway in their respective leads and the list serves no purpose. It also does not help that this is not the common name for either character. QuicoleJR ( talk) 12:18, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- @
QuicoleJR:
- Delete This is at best footnote territory for the fictional characters, without relevance for the plot nor the real world. Leave this info for fan wikis. – sgeureka t• c 10:10, 5 July 2024 (UTC)