The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
ATraintalk 13:02, 2 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete a mayor of a city where being mayor does not grant automatic notability. The coverage is all from local papers, and not the level that would suggest notability. I wish I could say that being a temple president was a sign of notability, but it just is not. Over 50 temple presidents get called each year. Nothing causes Muir to rise to the level of notability.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 22:55, 25 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete. Murray UT is not large enough to hand its mayors an automatic presumption of notability just for existing, but the article isn't sourced well enough to get him over
WP:NPOL #2 as the subject of more than just routine local coverage.
Bearcat (
talk) 19:29, 28 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.