From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Titoxd( ?!?) 01:34, 4 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Kurt Meyer (High Commissioner) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP :BIO. Ambassadors are not inherently notable. being ambassador to Cook Islands is a very minor role. LibStar ( talk) 14:41, 13 January 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. sst 16:46, 13 January 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. sst 16:46, 13 January 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. sst 16:46, 13 January 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 19:05, 20 January 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Diplomats can be notable if there's enough reliable source coverage of their careers as diplomats to get them over WP:GNG, but are not granted an automatic presumption of notability because diplomat — if you have to park the sourcing entirely on a simple namecheck of his existence in a news blurb which is actually about the appointment of his successor, then you haven't gotten him over the bar. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if he can be sourced properly. Bearcat ( talk) 18:51, 23 January 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 16:34, 27 January 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - as pointed out above, diplomats are not automatically notable, and this one does not pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 13:51, 28 January 2016 (UTC) reply
  • delete Sounds [1], [2], like a competent diplomat, just not enough coverage at this point in hi s career for an article.12:03, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete - No signs of better applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:21, 3 February 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.