The result was delete. Kimchi. sg 05:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Strong notability concerns. Also reads like a vanity article with a significant lack of objective references. Was proposed for deletion, but the tag was removed without explanation -- Tim D 00:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The following comments were added after this page was blanked by User:Otis Fodder, who created the article in question. Daveydw ee b ( chat/ review!) 07:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The problem with Wikipedia and it's users is that it (and they) assume everything of importance is web-based and can be found through Google, etc. It isn't and never will be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Otis Fodder ( talk • contribs)
COMMENT - - I don't know what you mean by "meta-resource" - sounds like questionable and vague Wikipedia-speak to me. Just because some cultural thing is "on the internet" (or can be quantified via often shady and/or meaningless internet statistics) doesn't mean it's "notable" (whatever "notable" means!) - some of the least notable things in the world started and died quick deaths on the internet. Where EXACTLY is it written that Google statistics are absolute LAW? For example, how is a website's (or person's or thing's) popularity or "success" or "notability" calculated on the internet? Is it calculated by number of VISITORS, PAGE VIEWS or ADVERTISEMENT REVENUE(s) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Otis Fodder ( talk • contribs)
COMMENT - When you say "we" ("We don't want blogs, we don't want chat forums.."), do you mean that you're paid by Wikipedia and you speak for them and all involved with Wikipedia? If you're NOT being paid to debate and investigate articles (such as this BENBENEK article), why do you do it and why do you use the word "we"? Are you speaking for Wikipedia as a thing or as an internet corporate entity? Or is the "we" referring to only you? This will help me respond to your immediately-previous comment...because I worry when single individuals start throwing the "we" word around. Plus I'm a little new to Wikipedia as an open-source text phenomenon. Plus I'm too lazy to hunt down your "Wikipedia User Profile" and see if you're part of official Wikapedia management. I figure you're probably just eager to respond to just about anything any body throws on these ever-changing and well-formatted pages. My other guess is that you're a BOT, but Wikipedia BOTs are probably out on Thanksgiving weekend vacation.
So, what is this "we" that you type of...? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Otis Fodder ( talk • contribs)
*Do Not Delete - how long do these "delete debates" tend to drag on? It seems like you guys have an awful lot of free time to waste on such an insignificant article as this! — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Otis Fodder (
talk •
contribs) 17:08, 27 November 2006