The result was keep. WP:SNOW keep. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 15:55, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Fair notice: I first noticed the lack of RS and coverage about Kotaku after another editor pointed it out to me, albeit not with the intention to have it deleted. In any case, the problem here is that while this is certainly a very popular site and something that you could use as a reliable source, there really isn't a lot of coverage that is specifically about the website. Popularity doesn't translate into notability, it just makes it more likely something will gain coverage. Other than a handful of articles such as this one, there really isn't anything out there to show that Kotaku passes WP:WEB. They are on a CNET list, but it's a fairly large list and not really the type of thing that would give absolute notability. I do love the website and I've used it for sourcing in the past, but I have to say that I don't think it passes notability guidelines. If anyone can find reliable sources that talk about the website in depth, I'm willing to be swayed. With the risk of launching a potential lengthy argument from fellow fans of the site, I just don't see anything that goes into depth to show that this passes GNG. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:44, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
On a second thought tho, I guess a redirect would avoid a red link crisis. -- Niemti ( talk) 10:24, 24 January 2014 (UTC)