The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by User:Bbb23 under criterion G5. (Non-admin closure) " Pepper" @ 00:19, 22 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Konrad Juengling (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not only completely fails WP:GNG but article was likely created by article subject himself who is also sock IP of indeffed user Kbabej. SPI will be filed. As to the article itself: completely a puff-piece that relies on relationships to this person and that person, name-dropping, and activities/incidences that are notable and were either supported by or not supported by article subject. Article subject is completely non-notable for Wikipedia's encyclopedic purpose. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 19:21, 19 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:00, 20 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:00, 20 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:00, 20 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:00, 20 July 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.