From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 00:12, 15 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Kolby Granville (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Consern was: "non-notable local government official; based on the username, this was created as advertising." Eeekster ( talk) 23:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 23:56, 7 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 23:56, 7 December 2014 (UTC) reply
  • City councillors are only deemed to pass WP:NPOL in global cities with populations in the millions, not in cities with populations of 160K — and the volume of sourcing here isn't nearly enough to claim a WP:GNG pass instead. Also WP:COI issues, given the creator's username. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 10:09, 9 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:55, 9 December 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete – This is pretty clearly COI and covered by the rule for city council members. Which of course the subject was unaware of when he created the page. However, I'm not convinced by the rationale for the rule on the Talk page, and think he has a point about the number of constituents represented. This could be discussed somewhere. –  Margin1522 ( talk) 00:26, 11 December 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.