- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 03:09, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
- Klemen Žumer ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The notability of the living person, in addition the significance and accuracy of the provided information are questionable.
- Delete. EP candidate who did not get elected. Sources do not constitute significant coverage. QVVERTYVS ( hm?) 12:41, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 15:54, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 15:54, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- Unelected candidates for political office do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates — if you cannot make a credible and properly sourced claim that they were already notable enough for an article before they became a candidate, then they do not become notable enough for an article until they win the election. But nothing here constitutes enough notability, and none of the sourcing is substantive enough to meet WP:GNG in lieu of failing WP:NPOL. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 18:03, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.