The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I wouldn't count the 148Apps (see WT:VG/RS discussion) and
All About Windows Phone reviews as reliable, but that still leaves two reviews (Gamezebo, Pocket Gamer) and possibly a third (I'm on the fence about Windows Central...) If the Windows Central staff is considered reliable, we're at the bare, bare minimum for writing an article, and if there is zero other critical reception or interest in its development, etc., I imagine the game would still be better covered in a list of Gameloft games, as this is not their first to receive this type of minimal treatment. czar 14:20, 1 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete, not notable by itself as a generic mobile title. Three reviews does not mean it should have its own article.
soetermans.
↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 10:25, 2 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:55, 6 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.