Hello. Thanks for deleting the page. However, I notice that large chunks of it have been moved to the Kersal page. Please remove those part because I did not give permission for that and intend using those parts elsewhere. Kersal Flats
The result was Speedy Deleted. IrishGuy talk 19:10, 11 November 2007 (UTC) reply
A problematic article in that it's a POV fork from the main Kersal article. It was originally written by an editor who appeared to be using the article as an extension of his own website which had the same subject matter of the article and to act as a mini photo gallery. When the link to his website was removed from the article he took umbrage and appears not to have returned. The article isn't referenced at all and appears to be original research with nothing to back it up. Talk page comments have suggested a merge to Kersal, but a response was that as nothing is referenced there's nothing to merge. I've never seen an article with so many maintenance tags (11). Although the area isn't totally non-notable this article on its own is not the way to go and ideally should be a part of the main Kersal article. As a result this article should be sent to dev/null because there's simply no need for it. -- WebHamster 01:29, 11 November 2007 (UTC) reply
I have tried to delete the page several time. I would add that the subject matter is of some social, economic and political importance. It feeds into a debate on housing solutions in the 1950s and 1960s and the similarities with the same issues today. From a narrow perspective the demolitions of these flats was the largest controlled demolition in the world. In addition the comments regarding the photographs are wrong. They are mine and are not taken from another site. Thus feel free to delete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kersalflats ( talk • contribs) 13:13, 11 November 2007 (UTC) reply